Real Property - Termination of Residential Real Estate Contracts - Contingency Clauses
HB 1029 modifies Maryland's real estate laws to clarify how homebuyers can get their deposits back when canceling a home purchase under a contingency clause (e.g., for inspections or appraisals). It requires sellers to provide the escrow agent with a copy of a court complaint or mediation request within 10 days of a buyer’s termination notice. If no legal action is filed within that period, the escrow agent must return the deposit to the buyer within 5 days. This affects homebuyers, sellers, and escrow agents by creating a clearer, time-bound process for handling deposits during contract terminations. The bill takes effect October 1, 2026.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 9, 2026
Last action Mar 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Real Property - Termination of Residential Real Estate Contracts - Contingency Clauses
→
Third - Real Property - Termination of Residential Real Estate Contracts - Contingency Clauses
·
6 edits
MODERATE
This bill adds procedural requirements for handling trust money when a residential real estate contract is terminated due to a contingency clause. It clarifies timelines for distributing funds and establishes protections for escrow agents and brokers who distribute money in good faith. The changes primarily affect the administrative process for releasing deposits when buyers back out of contracts.
REQUIREMENT
Added a committee report and house action status indicating the bill was favorably reported and adopted
Added specific timeline requirements for distributing trust money within 5 days after expiration of specified time periods
TECHNICAL
Changed the bill title from 'A BILL ENTITLED' to 'CHAPTER ______'
DEFINITION
Reorganized the definitions section by renumbering subsections and reformatting the list of contingency types
ENFORCEMENT
Added protection language stating that holders of trust money are not liable for distribution decisions made according to the new procedures
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date from October 1, 2026 to March 7, 2026 (the date the bill was read second time)
Floor votes · House of Delegates Mar 9, 2026
How they voted
127–0
Passed · 15 other
Total votes 142
Mar 9, 2026
D
Democratic103
90% Yea
R
Republican39
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 23, 2026
Committee
Referred Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Mar 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Economic Matters
lower
Mar 9, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (127-0-15)
house of delegates
Feb 9, 2026
Committee
First Reading Economic Matters
lower
11 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Andre Johnson
DDemocratic
P
Andrea Harrison
DDemocratic
P
Denise Roberts
DDemocratic
P
Edith Patterson
DDemocratic
P
Greg Wims
DDemocratic
P
Jamila Woods
DDemocratic
P
Jennifer White Holland
DDemocratic
P
Karen Toles
DDemocratic
P
Kym Taylor
DDemocratic
P
Mike Griffith
RRepublican
P
Veronica Turner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1029
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1029. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline