Peace Orders and Criminal Harassment - Intentional Visual Surveillance
SB 92 adds "intentional visual surveillance of areas of a residence where the petitioner has a reasonable expectation of privacy" as a new grounds for seeking a peace order in Maryland. It directly affects individuals experiencing unwanted filming or monitoring in private home spaces (like yards or windows) by requiring courts to grant specific relief. Key provisions include ordering the surveilling person to remove surveillance devices within 15 days and permanently stop further visual monitoring. The bill amends Sections 3-1503(a)(12) and 3-1505(d)(1)(vii) of Maryland’s Courts and Judicial Proceedings code. It takes effect October 1, 2025.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Oct 2024
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Oct 7, 2024
Signed May 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Peace Orders - Intentional Visual Surveillance
→
Third - Peace Orders and Criminal Harassment - Intentional Visual Surveillance
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill expands Maryland's peace order protections to include intentional visual surveillance of private residential areas, even when such surveillance isn't already prohibited under existing criminal harassment laws. The changes also broaden the definition of criminal harassment to explicitly cover certain visual surveillance activities that occur in areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from solely addressing peace orders related to visual surveillance to also including criminal harassment provisions, making visual surveillance in private residential areas a potential criminal offense.
SCOPE
Added criminal harassment provisions to address intentional visual surveillance of residential areas where privacy is expected, even if the surveillance isn't already prohibited under existing stalking laws.
ELIGIBILITY
Expanded peace order eligibility to include victims of visual surveillance in private residential areas as a ground for seeking legal protection.
DEFINITION
Added explicit definitions for 'residence' and 'visual surveillance' in the criminal law section to clarify what areas and activities are protected.
REQUIREMENT
Modified the list of acts that can be included in peace orders to explicitly include visual surveillance of private residential areas.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 7, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 16, 2025
How they voted
43–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 46
Feb 7, 2025
D
Democratic33
90% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
10
Committee
6
May 13, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 575
executive
Apr 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
Returned Passed
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 31, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Mar 31, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 16, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (128-0-11)
house of delegates
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Feb 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Feb 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Feb 7, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (43-0-3)
senate
Jan 8, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
Oct 7, 2024
Introduced
Pre-filed
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Paul Corderman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 92
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 92. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline