Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization of Pilot Program
SB 600 authorizes Baltimore City to implement a pilot program using automated stop sign monitoring systems in school zones, subject to local approval. It allows citations and civil penalties for drivers who fail to stop at stop signs in these zones, with specific defenses available for alleged violations. The bill specifies that penalties collected from these citations must cover system costs first, with any remaining funds dedicated solely to public safety programs like pedestrian safety initiatives. It also prohibits contractors administering the systems from being paid based on citation volume. This pilot program applies only to school zones within Baltimore City and requires city authorization before implementation.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Jan 27, 2025
Signed May 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Third - Baltimore City - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization of Pilot Program
→
Enrolled - Baltimore City and Takoma Park - Stop Sign Monitoring Systems - Authorization of Pilot Program
·
3 edits
·
May 13, 2025
MINOR
The bill was updated to expand its geographic scope from Baltimore City alone to include the City of Takoma Park, aligning the pilot program with existing authorization for Prince George's County. The text was also formatted to reflect its final 'Enrolled' status, including standard proofreading and sealing language required for passage.
Scope change
The bill's applicability was expanded to include the City of Takoma Park in addition to Baltimore City.
SCOPE
The pilot program for stop sign monitoring systems is now authorized for both Baltimore City and the City of Takoma Park.
TECHNICAL
Header information was updated to reflect the bill's final 'Enrolled' status, including proofreader signatures and the Great Seal presentation language.
The explanatory notes regarding how amendments are marked in the text were updated to include 'Italics' as an indicator for opposite chamber or conference committee changes.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 24, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 24, 2025
How they voted
36–10
Passed
Total votes 46
Mar 24, 2025
D
Democratic33
96% Yea
R
Republican13
69% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
12
Committee
7
Amendments
1
May 13, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 571
executive
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed Enrolled
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Introduced
Senate Concurs House Amendments
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed with Amendments
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee Amendment {
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Motion Special Order until Later This Session (Delegate Korman) Adopted
lower
Apr 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Apr 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Environment and Transportation
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-10)
senate
Mar 15, 2025
Committee
Referred Environment and Transportation
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cory McCray
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 600
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 600. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline