Criminal Law - Visual Surveillance With Prurient Intent - Modifications
SB 348 amends Maryland's criminal law to clarify and expand protections against surreptitious filming of people's private areas. It directly affects anyone who secretly films another person's genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breast (below the areola) without consent in places where privacy is expected, such as residences, dressing rooms, or hotel rooms. Key changes include explicitly defining "private place" to include homes and adding specific examples like tanning rooms, while clarifying that "visual surveillance" covers camera use, mirrors, or direct observation. Violations are punishable by up to one year in jail, a $2,500 fine, or both, and victims gain a civil right to sue for damages and attorney fees.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Apr 2025
Introduced Jan 16, 2025
Signed Apr 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Criminal Law - Visual Surveillance With Prurient Intent - Private Place
→
Third - Criminal Law - Visual Surveillance With Prurient Intent - Modifications
·
4 edits
MODERATE
SB 348 was amended to expand the definition of 'private place' to explicitly include residences and clarify the scope of visual surveillance prohibitions. The bill now more comprehensively addresses visual surveillance with prurient intent by updating the list of locations where privacy is expected and adding specific language about the location of the individual in public versus private settings.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to more clearly define what constitutes a 'private place' and to add language clarifying that the prohibition applies regardless of whether the individual is in a public or private place when their private area is being surveilled.
DEFINITION
Added 'A RESIDENCE' to the list of locations considered a private place where visual surveillance is prohibited.
Added language clarifying that the prohibition applies regardless of whether the individual is in a public or private place when their private area is being surveilled by camera.
TECHNICAL
Added 'THE LOCATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL' text at the end of subsection (c)(2), which appears to be a formatting or drafting addition.
Added co-sponsors to the bill (Senators Smith, Waldstreicher, Sydnor, West, Folden, McKay, and Henson) and included committee report and adoption status.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 7, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 18, 2025
How they voted
43–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 46
Feb 7, 2025
D
Democratic33
90% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Apr 22, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 152
executive
Apr 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Returned Passed
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 18, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (137-0-2)
house of delegates
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Feb 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Feb 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Feb 7, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (43-0-3)
senate
Jan 16, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
8 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 348
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 348. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline