Criminal Procedure - Child Victims - Testimony in Child Abuse Cases
SB 274 modifies Maryland court procedures for child abuse cases by allowing a child victim to testify remotely via closed-circuit television outside the courtroom if a judge determines their presence with the defendant would cause serious emotional distress. It specifies that only certain attorneys (prosecution, defense, child's advocate), court staff, and therapeutic support personnel may be present with the child during remote testimony, while the defendant and judge remain in the courtroom. The bill explicitly prohibits two-way video that would let the child see or hear the defendant during testimony. This directly affects child victims, defendants, and their legal representatives in abuse cases covered under Maryland’s Family Law and Criminal Law Articles.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Apr 2025
Introduced Jan 9, 2025
Signed Apr 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Criminal Procedure - Child Victims - Testimony in Child Abuse Cases
→
Third - Criminal Procedure - Child Victims - Testimony in Child Abuse Cases
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill adds a requirement that defendants or child respondents must have legal counsel for the child testimony provisions to apply, and introduces new rules about where closed-circuit testimony must occur and how defendants can communicate with their attorneys during testimony. The changes aim to ensure fair trial rights while protecting child victims from emotional distress.
Scope change
The bill now explicitly excludes cases where a defendant or child respondent lacks legal counsel from the child testimony protections.
ELIGIBILITY
Added requirement that the child testimony provisions do not apply if a defendant or child respondent is without counsel.
REQUIREMENT
Added new requirement that closed-circuit testimony must occur within the courthouse in a setting that mitigates emotional distress.
Added requirement that defendants must have a means to privately communicate orally and in real-time with their attorney during child testimony.
Reorganized subsections regarding who may be present during testimony and questioning procedures.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 18, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 15, 2025
How they voted
43–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 46
Feb 18, 2025
D
Democratic33
93% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Apr 22, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 151
executive
Apr 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
Returned Passed
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 31, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Mar 31, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 15, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (134-0-5)
house of delegates
Mar 7, 2025
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Mar 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (43-0-3)
senate
Jan 9, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
10 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 274
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 274. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline