Evidence - Interception of Oral Communications - Fair Housing Testing
SB 107 allows fair housing testers working for approved organizations (like government agencies, local governments, or specific nonprofits with 2+ years of experience) to legally intercept oral communications during testing. It requires testers to be a party to the conversation and limits intercepted evidence to enforcement of federal, state, or local fair housing laws. The bill modifies Maryland’s evidence code to create this exception, ensuring intercepted conversations can only be used for fair housing investigations - not in other legal cases. It directly affects fair housing testing programs and their personnel conducting discrimination tests. The law takes effect October 1, 2025.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Oct 2024
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Governor
Introduced Oct 18, 2024
Last action Mar 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Evidence - Interception of Oral Communications - Fair Housing Testing
→
Third - Evidence - Interception of Oral Communications - Fair Housing Testing
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill amends the definition of 'Nonprofit Civil Rights Organization' to explicitly include fair housing enforcement activities, clarifies the scope of oral communications for interception purposes, and adds administrative approval signatures for the bill's enactment. The changes ensure that organizations conducting fair housing testing are clearly recognized as eligible entities for intercepting oral communications under fair housing laws.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to explicitly include fair housing enforcement activities within the definition of nonprofit civil rights organizations, making it clearer that fair housing testers are authorized to intercept oral communications for evidence collection.
DEFINITION
Updated the definition of 'Nonprofit Civil Rights Organization' to explicitly include fair housing enforcement activities and testing programs.
Added clarification that oral communications do not include electronic communications, maintaining the distinction between traditional and digital communications.
TECHNICAL
Added administrative approval signatures for Governor, President of the Senate, and Speaker of the House of Delegates for bill enactment.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 24, 2025
How they voted
27–18
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 46
Feb 24, 2025
D
Democratic33
78% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Introduced
Floor Amendment {
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Motion Special Order until Next Session (Senator Folden) Adopted
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable Adopted
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Feb 24, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-18-1)
senate
Jan 8, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
Oct 18, 2024
Introduced
Pre-filed
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Charles Sydnor
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 107
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 107. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline