Municipalities - Enforcement Officers - Body-Worn Cameras
HB 748 authorizes Maryland municipalities to adopt policies allowing enforcement officers (like police or code enforcement staff) to use body-worn cameras during duties. It requires any municipality adopting such a policy to publish a detailed written policy covering 17 specific areas, including when recording is mandatory or prohibited, data storage, privacy protections, and consequences for policy violations. The policy must address camera testing, failure procedures, consent requirements, and secure handling of recordings. This bill directly affects local governments and enforcement officers by establishing a framework for camera use. The policy must be published before implementation, with the law taking effect October 1, 2025.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 27, 2025
Last action Mar 25, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Municipalities - Enforcement Officers - Body-Worn Cameras
→
Third - Municipalities - Enforcement Officers - Body-Worn Cameras
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to expand its scope by including municipal enforcement officers in the legal definition of 'law enforcement officer' for wiretapping and electronic surveillance exceptions, while also updating the bill's title and committee status to reflect its adoption. The amendments clarify that municipal code enforcement, parking, and traffic officers are now covered under the body-worn camera provisions.
Scope change
The bill now explicitly includes municipal enforcement officers (code enforcement, parking, and traffic) within the definition of 'law enforcement officer' for purposes of wiretapping and electronic surveillance exceptions when using body-worn cameras.
DEFINITION
Added a new definition to the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article that includes municipal enforcement officers in the definition of 'law enforcement officer' for wiretapping and electronic surveillance exceptions.
SCOPE
Changed the bill's purpose statement to reflect the inclusion of municipal enforcement officers in the legal definition of law enforcement officer for surveillance exceptions.
Updated the bill's title from 'First' to 'Third' to reflect its progression through legislative sessions.
TIMELINE
Added committee report status showing the bill was favorably amended and adopted by the House, with a second reading date of March 1, 2025.
Floor votes · House of Delegates Mar 3, 2025
How they voted
114–22
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 139
Mar 3, 2025
D
Democratic100
96% Yea
R
Republican39
51% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 3, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (114-22-3)
house of delegates
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judiciary
lower
6 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 748
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 748. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline