Criminal Procedure - U Nonimmigrant Status Petitions and Immigration Enforcement at Sensitive Locations
HB 579 modifies Maryland's certification process for U Nonimmigrant Status visas (U visas), which help victims of certain crimes access legal immigration status. The bill expands who can certify victim helpfulness to include agencies like child protective services, adult protective services, and the Commission on Civil Rights (not just police). It requires certifying officials to provide specific details about the crime and victim's cooperation when completing Form I-918, Supplement B. This directly affects crime victims seeking U visas and the state agencies that issue these certifications. The bill aligns Maryland's process with federal U visa guidelines to streamline eligibility verification.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action Apr 7, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Criminal Procedure – U Nonimmigrant Status Petitions
→
Third - Criminal Procedure - U Nonimmigrant Status Petitions and Immigration Enforcement at Sensitive Locations
·
5 edits
MODERATE
HB 579 was amended to expand its scope from solely addressing U Nonimmigrant Status petitions to also include federal immigration enforcement actions at sensitive locations. The bill now requires federal law enforcement officers to notify specific individuals at sensitive locations about immigration actions, adds new definitions for sensitive locations, and updates the list of eligible entities for victim certification. Several sponsors were added to the bill, and the committee report indicates the bill was adopted with amendments.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to include immigration enforcement at sensitive locations in addition to U Nonimmigrant Status petitions, and new definitions were added to clarify what constitutes a sensitive location and who must be notified.
ENFORCEMENT
Added requirements for federal law enforcement officers to notify specific individuals at sensitive locations about federal immigration enforcement actions.
DEFINITION
Added a new definition for 'federal law enforcement officer' and expanded the definition of 'certifying entity' to include additional authorities.
REQUIREMENT
Added requirements for the Attorney General to develop and publish guidance relating to federal immigration enforcement actions at sensitive locations.
ELIGIBILITY
Modified the list of individuals eligible to request victim helpfulness certification to include additional categories such as victim advocates and other representatives.
TECHNICAL
Added new sections to the State Government Article to define sensitive locations and establish notification requirements.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 19, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 26, 2025
How they voted
31–12
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 46
Mar 19, 2025
D
Democratic33
90% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
14
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Conference Committee Report {
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Conference Committee Appointed (Senators Smith, Love and McKay)
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
House Conference Committee Appointed (Delegates Moon, Embry and Valentine)
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Introduced
House Refuses Concur Senate Amendments
upper
Apr 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Conference Committee Appointed (Delegates Moon, Embry and Valentine)
lower
Apr 5, 2025
Introduced
House Refuses Concur Senate Amendments
lower
Apr 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Apr 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Apr 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 26, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (122-14-3)
house of delegates
Mar 19, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-12-3)
senate
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Motion Special Order until 03/15 (Delegate Clippinger) Adopted
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judiciary
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judiciary
lower
13 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Aaron Kaufman
DDemocratic
P
Cheryl Pasteur
DDemocratic
P
David Moon
DDemocratic
P
Deni Taveras
DDemocratic
P
Elizabeth Embry
DDemocratic
P
Gary Simmons
DDemocratic
P
Jared Solomon
DDemocratic
P
Jessica Feldmark
DDemocratic
P
Jheanelle Wilkins
DDemocratic
P
Julie Palakovich Carr
DDemocratic
P
Robbyn Lewis
DDemocratic
P
Scott Phillips
DDemocratic
P
Sean Stinnett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 579
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 579. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline