CHILDREN: Provides relative to the modification of child custody. (8/1/26)
SB 76 establishes clear legal standards for modifying child custody arrangements in Louisiana. It requires courts to use a higher evidentiary standard (clear and convincing evidence) within five years of a court-reviewed custody decision ("considered decree") to change custody, unless the current arrangement is harming the child. For other cases - including after five years, consent decrees (where parties agreed without court evidence), or "hybrid" proceedings - modifications need a significant change in circumstances affecting the child's welfare, in the child's best interest. The bill clarifies that minor schedule adjustments, like shifting visitation days, do not qualify for modification under these rules.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Signed May 11, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB76 Original
→
SB76 Act 93
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill codifies existing court rulings into written law to clarify when child custody orders can be modified. It establishes two distinct standards: a strict 'best interest' standard for the first five years after a custody judgment based on a full hearing, and a 'change in circumstances' standard for cases after five years or those based on agreed-upon settlements.
Scope change
The bill clarifies the scope of custody modification rules by explicitly defining what constitutes a 'considered decree' versus a 'consent decree' and specifying which types of orders (like temporary ones or those by hearing officers) are excluded from these rules.
DEFINITION
Added a specific definition for 'considered decree' as a judgment based on the court's evaluation of evidence regarding parental fitness.
Added a new category for 'all other cases' which includes consent decrees and cases after five years, applying a lower 'change in circumstances' standard instead of the strict 'best interest' standard.
TIMELINE
Changed the modification window from a generic 'award' to a specific 'five-year' period following a judgment rendered by considered decree.
REQUIREMENT
Added specific exclusions stating that interim, temporary orders and orders entered by hearing officers do not follow these modification standards.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 7, 2026 · House Apr 28, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Apr 7, 2026
D
Democratic12
83% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendments proposed by the House read and concurred in by a vote of 33 yeas and 0 nays.
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 93, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Introduced
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (7-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Apr 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title and passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 0 nays; ordered reengrossed and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Reported favorably.
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Greg Miller
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 76
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 76. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline