CHILDREN: Provides for testimony of medical experts in child custody and in need of care cases. (8/1/26)
SB 66 requires Louisiana courts to prioritize testimony from medical experts subpoenaed in child custody or child in need of care cases involving alleged abuse or neglect. It mandates that courts hear these medical experts before other witnesses and allows for expedited hearings to secure their testimony before granting continuances. The law applies specifically to cases under Louisiana’s Civil Code (custody) and Children’s Code (child in need of care). This changes court scheduling procedures to ensure medical evidence about potential child harm is reviewed more promptly. The bill does not alter custody standards or create new legal requirements beyond testimony prioritization.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
Apr 2026
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Signed Apr 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB66 Original
→
SB66 Act
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to add Representatives to the list of sponsors and updated the bill's title to reflect broader trial procedures rather than just continuances. The substantive legal text was significantly rewritten to clarify that medical expert testimony in abuse or neglect cases must be heard before other witnesses, with the exception of extenuating circumstances. The new text also explicitly defines the scope of the law to cover both child custody and child in need of care proceedings.
Scope change
The bill's scope was clarified to explicitly apply to both child custody proceedings and child in need of care proceedings, and the language was updated to cover general trial procedures instead of just continuances.
ELIGIBILITY
Added Representatives Chenevert, Edmonston, and Larvadin as co-sponsors to the bill.
REQUIREMENT
Changed the statutory language from allowing a continuance to requiring that medical expert testimony be heard in priority to all other witnesses, unless extenuating circumstances exist.
DEFINITION
Renamed the new statute section from 'Continuance' to 'Applicability' and renumbered the sections to 360 and 360.1.
SCOPE
Updated the bill's purpose statement to include 'trial procedure' and 'related matters' in addition to the original focus on continuances.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 13, 2026 · House Apr 28, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Apr 13, 2026
D
Democratic12
100% Yea
R
Republican28
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 94, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Introduced
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (6-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
lower
Apr 14, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read by title, passed by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays, and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Apr 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Reported with amendments.
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Valarie Hodges
RRepublican
Co
Ed Larvadain
DDemocratic
Co
Emily Chenevert
RRepublican
Co
Kathy Edmonston
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 66
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 66. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline