CRIMINAL/PROCEDURE: Provides relative to the recall of warrants of arrest
HB 64 allows judicial officers (magistrates) to cancel arrest warrants they previously issued. It directly affects magistrates who issue warrants, peace officers who execute them, and individuals subject to active warrants. The bill adds a new provision (Article 202(H)) enabling magistrates to recall warrants, and updates Article 204 to require peace officers to stop executing any warrant that has been recalled. This creates a clear process to cancel warrants and prevents enforcement of recalled warrants, streamlining the correction of errors or outdated warrants.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Jan 30, 2026
Signed May 15, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB64 Original
→
HB64 Act
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill updates the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure to clarify how arrest warrants are recalled and managed. It adds a requirement for magistrates to immediately notify the District Attorney and the relevant law enforcement agency when they recall a warrant, ensuring better communication between courts and police. The bill also formally establishes a new article defining the effective period of arrest warrants until they are executed or recalled.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of the Code of Criminal Procedure by adding a new article (Article 205) regarding the effective period of warrants and modifying the recall process to include mandatory notifications.
REQUIREMENT
Added a mandatory requirement for magistrates to provide immediate written notice to the District Attorney and the law enforcement agency when recalling an arrest warrant.
DEFINITION
Added a new article (Article 205) explicitly stating that arrest warrants remain in effect until they are executed or recalled.
ENFORCEMENT
Modified the recall process to ensure peace officers are aware of a warrant's status through formal notification, preventing the execution of recalled warrants.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 22, 2026 · House Mar 30, 2026
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Apr 22, 2026
D
Democratic12
75% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
5
May 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 95, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
Apr 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments.
upper
Mar 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 94, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (12-0).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nicholas Muscarello
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 64
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 64. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline