HB 342 Louisiana House · 2026 Regular Session

EDUCATION/SPECIAL: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of proof in any special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of a student's current or proposed program or placement (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

HB 342 requires local education agencies (LEAs) in Louisiana to prove the appropriateness of a student's special education program or placement during due process hearings, shifting the burden of proof from parents to the school district. This directly affects parents of students in special education and the LEAs (like school districts) involved in these disputes. The bill specifies that LEAs must meet this burden by showing the program or placement is appropriate "by a preponderance of the evidence" (more likely than not). The change applies to both current and proposed educational plans in formal due process hearings.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 24, 2026 Signed Jun 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

HB342 Original HB342 Act 943 · 1 edit
MINOR
This bill updates the official title and sponsors of HB 342 to reflect its final passage as Act 943. The core legal requirement remains unchanged: local education agencies must prove the appropriateness of a student's special education program or placement by a preponderance of the evidence during due process hearings.
Scope change
The scope of the law regarding special education due process remains the same; only the bill's metadata (title and sponsors) was updated to reflect its enactment status.
TECHNICAL

The bill title was changed from 'HB 342 Original' to 'HB 342 Act 943' and the sponsor list was expanded to include Representatives Adams, Amedee, Bayham, Berault, Boyd, Broussard, Carpenter, Wilford Carter, Carver, Chassion, Chenevert, Edmonston, Egan, Fisher, Freiberg, Green, Jackson, Travis Johnson, Jordan, Lacombe, Terry Landry, Larvadain, Lyons, Marcelle, Martinez, Mena, Moore, Newell, Owen, Phelps, Schamerhorn, Spell, Stagni, Taylor, Ventrella, Walters, Wiley, Wyble, Young, and Zeringue.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · House Apr 14, 2026

How they voted

360
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic12
11 Yea 1
91% Yea
R Republican28
25 Yea 3
89% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
5
May 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 25, 2026
Committee
Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments.
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 99, nays 2. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (11-0).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Education.
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Education.
lower
1 primary · 38 co-sponsors

Sponsors