EDUCATION/SPECIAL: Provides that a local education agency shall have the burden of proof in any special education due process hearing relative to the appropriateness of a student's current or proposed program or placement (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)
HB 342 requires local education agencies (LEAs) in Louisiana to prove the appropriateness of a student's special education program or placement during due process hearings, shifting the burden of proof from parents to the school district. This directly affects parents of students in special education and the LEAs (like school districts) involved in these disputes. The bill specifies that LEAs must meet this burden by showing the program or placement is appropriate "by a preponderance of the evidence" (more likely than not). The change applies to both current and proposed educational plans in formal due process hearings.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 24, 2026
Signed Jun 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB342 Original
→
HB342 Act 943
·
1 edit
MINOR
This bill updates the official title and sponsors of HB 342 to reflect its final passage as Act 943. The core legal requirement remains unchanged: local education agencies must prove the appropriateness of a student's special education program or placement by a preponderance of the evidence during due process hearings.
Scope change
The scope of the law regarding special education due process remains the same; only the bill's metadata (title and sponsors) was updated to reflect its enactment status.
TECHNICAL
The bill title was changed from 'HB 342 Original' to 'HB 342 Act 943' and the sponsor list was expanded to include Representatives Adams, Amedee, Bayham, Berault, Boyd, Broussard, Carpenter, Wilford Carter, Carver, Chassion, Chenevert, Edmonston, Egan, Fisher, Freiberg, Green, Jackson, Travis Johnson, Jordan, Lacombe, Terry Landry, Larvadain, Lyons, Marcelle, Martinez, Mena, Moore, Newell, Owen, Phelps, Schamerhorn, Spell, Stagni, Taylor, Ventrella, Walters, Wiley, Wyble, Young, and Zeringue.
Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · House Apr 14, 2026
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic12
91% Yea
R
Republican28
89% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
5
May 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 25, 2026
Committee
Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments.
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 99, nays 2. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (11-0).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Education.
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Education.
lower
1 primary · 38 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alonzo Knox
DDemocratic
Co
Adrian Fisher
DDemocratic
Co
Annie Spell
RRepublican
Co
Barbara Carpenter
DDemocratic
Co
Barbara Freiberg
RRepublican
Co
BA
Beryl Amedée
RRepublican
Co
Candace Newell
DDemocratic
Co
Chasity Martinez
DDemocratic
Co
Chuck Owen
RRepublican
Co
Delisha Boyd
DDemocratic
Co
Denise Marcelle
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 342
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 342. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline