DISTRICT ATTORNEYS: Provides relative to the appointment of a substitute for a recused district attorney
HB 243 addresses the process when a district attorney must step aside (recuse) from a case. It requires the trial judge to either appoint a qualified substitute attorney or notify the state attorney general, who must then appoint a staff member or another district attorney to replace the recused official. The appointed substitute gains all the legal authority of the original district attorney for that specific case. This bill streamlines the replacement process without changing substantive law.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Signed Jun 1, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB243 Original
→
HB243 Act 630
·
2 edits
MINOR
This bill converts a draft proposal into an official enacted law by adding approval signatures from the Speaker, Senate President, and Governor. It removes the original bill's metadata, including the legislative services digest and page numbering, while retaining the core text regarding district attorney recusal procedures.
Scope change
The bill's substantive scope regarding district attorney recusal remains unchanged; the only changes are administrative formatting and the addition of executive approval signatures.
TECHNICAL
Added approval signatures from the Speaker of the House, President of the Senate, and Governor to finalize the bill as Act No. 630.
Removed the original bill header, legislative digest, and page numbering to reflect the final enrolled version.
Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · House Apr 29, 2026
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic12
83% Yea
R
Republican28
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
4
Committee
5
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 25, 2026
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 95, nays 1. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (16-0).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Wilder
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 243
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 243. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline