CRIME: Provides relative to wearing masks in public (RE SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
This bill modifies the language used in a law regarding wearing masks in public by changing the requirement from being "charged with a felony" to being "convicted of a felony." The change directly affects individuals who have already been found guilty of serious crimes, rather than those currently accused. By removing the word "charged," the amendment ensures that only people with final court convictions must comply with the mask mandate, excluding those who are merely awaiting trial. This adjustment narrows the scope of who is legally required to wear masks under the existing public health regulations.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced May 20, 2026
Last action May 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB1259 Reengrossed
→
HB1259 Engrossed
·
3 edits
·
May 26, 2026
MINOR
The bill was transitioned from a 'Reengrossed' version to an 'Engrossed' version, finalizing its text for the next legislative stage. A key substantive change involves the trigger for the enhanced penalty: the bill now applies when a person is 'charged' with a felony while wearing a mask, rather than waiting until they are 'convicted'. This adjustment shifts the legal threshold to the point of accusation.
Scope change
The scope of the enhanced penalty provision was broadened to apply at the stage of being charged, rather than being limited to those who have already been convicted.
ENFORCEMENT
Changed the condition for enhanced penalties from requiring a 'conviction' to requiring that the person be 'charged' with the offense.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill header and footer to reflect the change from 'Reengrossed' to 'Engrossed' status.
Adjusted the formatting of the bill title to accommodate the new 'Engrossed' designation.
Floor votes · House May 26, 2026
How they voted
69–31
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 105
May 26, 2026
D
Democratic33
87% Nay
R
Republican72
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
2
Committee
1
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 69, nays 30. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read by title, substitute title adopted, lies over in the same order of business, substitute for HB No. 255 reported by the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice (8-3).
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Bayham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1259
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1259. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline