CRIMINAL/JUSTICE: Prohibits certain individuals from having an ownership interest or financial interest in any company that provides electronic monitoring services (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
This bill amends an existing law to expand the list of law enforcement officials who are prohibited from owning or having financial interests in companies that provide electronic monitoring services. The specific change adds "chief of police, constable, marshal" to the categories of individuals already restricted, which currently include sheriffs. By updating the text, the legislation ensures these additional officials are also barred from profiting from the industry they regulate. The measure was recently passed by the House of Representatives and sent to the Senate for further consideration.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced May 7, 2026
Signed Jun 1, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB1257 Original
→
HB1257 Act 729
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was finalized as Act 729, removing the House digest and digest-related metadata while retaining the core legislative text. The substantive policy change narrows the scope of the electronic monitoring vendor prohibition, restricting it from all elected officials to only elected judges, district attorneys, sheriffs, and chiefs of police, along with their immediate family members.
Scope change
The bill's applicability was narrowed from all elected officials to a specific subset of law enforcement and judicial officers.
SCOPE
The prohibition on owning or having a financial interest in electronic monitoring companies was limited to elected judges, district attorneys, sheriffs, and chiefs of police, removing the restriction for other elected officials like legislators or governors.
The term 'vendor' was explicitly added to the list of prohibited roles to ensure clarity that these officials cannot act as vendors for these services.
TECHNICAL
The House digest, abstract, and summary sections explaining the bill's purpose and history were removed, as these are informational and not part of the final enacted law.
The document header was updated to reflect the bill's final status as 'ENROLLED' and 'ACT No. 729' instead of 'HB 1257 Original'.
Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · House May 13, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic12
91% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
4
Committee
3
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read by title, passed by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 25, 2026
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
May 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 97, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read by title, substitute title adopted, lies over in the same order of business, substitute for HB No. 123 reported by the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice (10-0).
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Bayham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1257
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1257. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline