JUDGES: Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (1/1/27)
SB 86 is a proposed constitutional amendment that aims to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges. If enacted, this measure would allow judges to continue serving without being subject to a specific age limit for retirement. The bill directly affects judges by eliminating this existing requirement from the state constitution.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Failed
May 2025
Governor
Introduced Apr 3, 2025
Last action May 7, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
SB86 Original
→
SB86 Engrossed
·
4 edits
·
Apr 30, 2025
MODERATE
The bill was modified to remove a provision that would have prohibited age-based discrimination for all public office holders and employees, limiting the amendment's scope strictly to judges. Additionally, the effective date for the retirement age changes was delayed from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2027, and the election date was moved from November 2025 to November 2026.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed by removing the language that would have eliminated mandatory retirement ages for all public office holders and public employees, applying the change only to judges.
SCOPE
Removed the constitutional amendment language that would have prohibited denying public office or employment based solely on age for all public employees and office holders.
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date of the amendment from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2027.
Changed the election date for voter approval from November 15, 2025, to November 3, 2026.
TECHNICAL
Updated the ballot language to remove references to public employees and office holders, focusing solely on judges.
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2025
How they voted
12–23
Failed · 2 other
Total votes 37
May 6, 2025
D
Democratic11
81% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
2
May 6, 2025
Vote failed
Senate Vote: fail (12-23-2)
senate
Apr 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments.
upper
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Regina Barrow
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 86
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 86. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline