SUCCESSIONS: Provides for the continuous revision of successions. (8/1/25)
SB 67 is a procedural bill that requires courts to regularly review succession laws (such as inheritance or office succession rules). It makes a minor grammatical correction to the bill text and changes "may" to "shall" to mandate continuous review. The bill does not create new policies, affect specific groups, or change existing succession procedures. It passed the Senate unanimously with no debate or opposition. This is a technical amendment focused solely on procedural requirements for reviewing existing succession laws.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Apr 2, 2025
Signed Jun 4, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB67 Original
→
SB67 Act
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill updates the formal title and sponsors of the legislation to reflect its final enactment status. It also refines the procedural rules for probating wills by clarifying that oral objections must be immediately followed by an opportunity to examine the document, and it adds a specific requirement for courts to order the payment of inheritance taxes from succession assets when an indigent party litigates without prepaying costs.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on succession law and probate procedures, but the applicability of the cost-payment rule is now explicitly extended to succession proceedings involving indigent parties.
TECHNICAL
Updated the document header to change the status from 'Original' to 'Enrolled Act No. 34' and added additional representatives to the list of sponsors.
REQUIREMENT
Clarified the objection process for wills by requiring that an oral objection must specify grounds for invalidity and be urged immediately after the objector examines the testament.
Added a new provision requiring courts to order the payment of all costs due to public officers from succession assets when an indigent party is permitted to litigate without prepaying costs.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2025 · House May 22, 2025
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Apr 29, 2025
D
Democratic11
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 94, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 13, 2025
Introduced
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
lower
May 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (10-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
lower
May 5, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read by title, passed by a vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays, and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments.
upper
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Franklin Foil
RRepublican
Co
Candace Newell
DDemocratic
Co
Sylvia Taylor
DDemocratic
Co
Wilford Carter
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 67
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 67. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline