NUTRITION: Prohibits the serving and selling of ultra-processed foods in public schools. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
SB 117 prohibits public schools from serving or selling ultra-processed foods - defined as foods high in additives and low in nutrients, like many packaged snacks and sugary drinks. The bill includes an exemption for certain foods (though specific exclusions aren't detailed in the current text). This change would directly affect school meal programs, cafeteria offerings, and student nutrition choices in all public schools across the state. The legislation aims to improve dietary standards in educational settings through this specific food service restriction.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
House Passage
Jun 2025
Vetoed
Jun 2025
Introduced Apr 3, 2025
Vetoed Jun 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB117 Original
→
Senate Floor Bureau Note, #1033, Miguez, Adopted
·
1 edit
MINOR
The Senate amended SB 117 to add a new exemption clause, ensuring that the ban on ultra-processed foods does not apply to food served or sold in specific settings. This change clarifies the law's applicability by preventing the prohibition from inadvertently covering areas like vending machines or cafeterias outside the scope of the intended restrictions, likely referring to non-school hours or specific zones not covered by the original text.
Scope change
The bill's scope was modified to include an explicit exemption for certain food service areas or times, narrowing the application of the ultra-processed food ban.
SCOPE
Added a new subsection (E) stating that the provisions of the section shall not apply to food served or sold in unspecified locations or contexts, creating a carve-out from the general prohibition.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2025 · House Jun 3, 2025
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Apr 29, 2025
D
Democratic11
90% Yea
R
Republican26
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Jun 20, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Jun 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Amendments proposed by the House read and concurred in by a vote of 37 yeas and 1 nays.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 97, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 27, 2025
Introduced
Read by title, amended, returned to the calendar.
lower
May 15, 2025
Introduced
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (8-1). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
lower
May 5, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Education.
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title and passed by a vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays; ordered reengrossed and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Reported with amendments.
upper
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Education.
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 117
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 117. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline