CRIMINAL/PROCEDURE: Provides relative to post conviction relief (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
HB 675 is a procedural amendment to a bill related to post-conviction relief procedures. It specifically changes the reference from "LPD Fund" to "Overcollections Fund" in a technical section of the legislation. This amendment does not alter substantive post-conviction relief processes or directly affect individuals seeking relief. The change is administrative, updating the name of a specific fund used for handling excess payments. The bill is currently scheduled for floor debate following committee approval.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2025
House Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Apr 24, 2025
Signed Jun 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB675 Original
→
HB675 Act
·
5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was finalized into an enrolled act, updating the list of sponsors and streamlining the legislative text. Substantively, it reorganized the Code of Criminal Procedure to clarify definitions of 'post conviction relief' and 'shell petitions.' It introduced a specific exception allowing claims of factual innocence to bypass standard time limits if filed by a certain date, while simultaneously establishing a future cutoff date (August 1, 2025) after which defendants pleading guilty will lose the right to claim factual innocence.
Scope change
The bill's scope shifted from a draft proposal to an enacted law, with specific eligibility criteria for factual innocence claims now defined by trial date and plea type.
TECHNICAL
The document format changed from a draft bill to an enrolled act, updating the header to reflect the final version with all sponsoring representatives listed.
DEFINITION
Definitions for 'post conviction relief' and 'shell petition' were added or clarified to standardize how these legal procedures are understood.
TIMELINE
A specific deadline of December 31, 2022, was added as a cutoff date for filing factual innocence claims to avoid standard time limits.
ELIGIBILITY
A new eligibility restriction was added stating that defendants who plead guilty on or after August 1, 2025, are no longer entitled to claim factual innocence.
REQUIREMENT
The bill now explicitly allows recantation of prior sworn testimony as grounds for relief, provided it is corroborated by other evidence.
Floor votes · Senate Jun 9, 2025 · House May 21, 2025
How they voted
26–11
Passed
Total votes 37
Jun 9, 2025
D
Democratic11
100% Nay
R
Republican26
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Jun 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 81, nays 14, Senate amendments concurred in.
lower
Jun 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 28 yeas and 11 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Recalled from Committee.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Committee
Read by title. Recommitted to the Committee on Finance.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee amendments read and adopted.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Reported with amendments.
upper
May 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 71, nays 26. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (17-0).
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Committee
Read by title, ordered engrossed, recommitted to the Committee on Appropriations.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read by title, substitute title adopted, lies over in the same order of business, substitute for HB No. 572 reported by the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice (10-0).
lower
1 primary · 15 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Brian Glorioso
RRepublican
Co
Debbie Villio
RRepublican
Co
Dewith Carrier
RRepublican
Co
Dixon McMakin
RRepublican
Co
Dodie Horton
RRepublican
Co
Gabe Firment
RRepublican
Co
Julie Emerson
RRepublican
Co
Kathy Edmonston
RRepublican
Co
Kellee Hennessy
RRepublican
Co
Kim Coates
RRepublican
Co
Laurie Schlegel
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 675
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 675. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline