HB 6 Louisiana House · 2025 Regular Session

CRIME/THEFT: Creates the crime of misappropriation of funds in connection with the payment of utility services (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

HB 6 amends existing law to clarify when misappropriating funds for utility payments becomes a crime. It requires payment of utility bills within 60 days of receipt and adds two key exceptions: if a tenant fails to pay their share or if the utility company makes an error in billing. This affects property managers, landlords, and others handling utility payments who might otherwise face charges for delays. The bill specifically prevents prosecution in cases where the delay stems from tenant non-payment or company billing mistakes.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2025
House Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Feb 17, 2025 Signed Jun 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

HB6 Original HB6 Act · 5 edits
MODERATE
This bill transforms a draft proposal into an official act, formally enacting a new crime for misappropriating utility funds. It establishes specific penalties based on the amount of money diverted and adds a 'good faith' exception for administrative errors, ensuring the law targets intentional fraud rather than simple mistakes.
Scope change
The bill's scope is now finalized as law, expanding the definition of 'utility services' to explicitly include heat and steam, and clarifying that the law applies to both individuals and business entities.
ENFORCEMENT

Formally enacted R.S. 14:71.5 as a new criminal statute with tiered penalties ranging from six months to twenty years in prison depending on the value of misappropriated funds.

EXCEPTIONS

Introduced a specific exception stating the law does not apply if the failure to pay is due to administrative, clerical, or technical errors by the utility company.

DEFINITION

Updated the definition of 'utility services' to explicitly list heat and steam, and clarified that 'person' includes representatives and officers of corporations.

REQUIREMENT

Added a legislative intent statement to clarify that the law targets a pattern of intentional misconduct rather than isolated disputes.

TECHNICAL

Changed the document status from a prefiled bill to an enrolled act and updated the page count to reflect the final version.

Floor votes · Senate Jun 8, 2025 · House May 20, 2025

How they voted

320
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 37
Jun 8, 2025
D Democratic11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
R Republican26
22 Yea 4
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Jun 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.
lower
Jun 8, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 34 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments. Rules suspended. Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 74, nays 9. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (8-2).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
lower
Feb 17, 2025
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Steven Jackson
Steven Jackson
DDemocratic
LA
2