CIVIL/DAMAGES: Provides relative to recovery limitations for failure to maintain compulsory motor vehicle liability security
HB 434 modifies Louisiana law to limit compensation for individuals involved in car accidents when the at-fault driver failed to maintain required auto insurance. Specifically, it adds a new provision stating that recovery limitations apply only to "general damages" (such as pain and suffering), not to other types of compensation like medical bills or lost wages. This change directly affects accident victims seeking damages from uninsured drivers, restricting the scope of recoverable losses. The bill amends Louisiana Revised Statute 32:866 to clarify this limitation in the legal framework for civil liability claims.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Apr 4, 2025
Signed May 28, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB434 Original
→
HB434 Act
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill updates the text of an existing law regarding insurance recovery limits to match the final enacted version. The primary substantive change is the addition of a new subsection (F) that grants insurance companies the right to recover money they paid on behalf of their insureds from the at-fault driver, but only for amounts exceeding the first $150,000 in bodily injury and $250,000 in property damage. The bill also removes the Digest section, which previously summarized the law's intent, as digests are not part of the official statute.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's applicability remains unchanged; it continues to apply to cases where a driver fails to maintain compulsory motor vehicle liability security.
REQUIREMENT
Added new subsection F granting insurers subrogation rights to recover payments made to third parties, limited to amounts exceeding $150,000 for bodily injury and $250,000 for property damages.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill's header and sponsor list to reflect the enrolled version with multiple representatives and the official Act number.
Removed the Digest section and the 'HLS' identifier, as these are explanatory aids and not part of the binding law.
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2025 · House Apr 28, 2025
How they voted
27–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 38
May 21, 2025
D
Democratic11
81% Nay
R
Republican27
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
4
Committee
5
May 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 28 yeas and 9 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 19, 2025
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 76, nays 14. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (11-2-1).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Apr 4, 2025
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
1 primary · 32 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jason DeWitt
RRepublican
Co
Beau Beaullieu
RRepublican
Co
BA
Beryl Amedée
RRepublican
Co
Beth Billings
RRepublican
Co
Brian Glorioso
RRepublican
Co
Bryan Fontenot
RRepublican
Co
Chad Boyer
RRepublican
Co
Chance Henry
RRepublican
Co
Chris Turner
RRepublican
Co
Chuck Owen
RRepublican
Co
Dennis Bamburg
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 434
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 434. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline