CIVIL/LAW: Provides for transparency in medical expenses
HB 34 revises how medical expenses are handled in civil lawsuits, impacting claimants seeking recovery for medical costs and parties involved in trials. It limits the recovery of medical expenses to amounts considered reasonable for the claim. The bill allows any party to introduce evidence of both the billed and paid amounts for medical services. Furthermore, agreements between healthcare providers and third parties, such as letters of protection with attorneys, will be admissible as evidence to ensure transparency.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 6, 2025
Last action Apr 29, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB34 Original
→
HB34 Engrossed
·
4 edits
·
Apr 28, 2025
MODERATE
This bill significantly rewrites Louisiana's medical expense recovery laws to clarify how damages are calculated when insurance companies pay for a patient's care. The changes remove confusing subsections, add new definitions for terms like 'contracted medical provider,' and establish clearer rules on whether juries can see insurance payment details during a trial.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope by adding new definitions and clarifying rules for calculating damages, while simultaneously narrowing the scope by repealing previous subsections (E, F, and G) that contained conflicting or outdated evidence rules.
DEFINITION
Added specific definitions for 'contracted medical provider' and 'cost of procurement' to standardize how medical bills and insurance payments are understood in court.
REQUIREMENT
Deleted previous subsections that restricted evidence rules, replacing them with a new framework that allows parties to introduce evidence about billed amounts, paid amounts, or both to prove the reasonableness of medical costs.
Introduced new rules stating that agreements between healthcare providers and third parties (such as letters of protection or guarantees of payment) are now admissible as evidence in court.
TIMELINE
Maintained the effective date of January 1, 2026, and confirmed the law applies only to cases filed on or after that date.
Floor votes · House Apr 28, 2025
How they voted
66–26
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 101
Apr 28, 2025
D
Democratic30
76% Nay
R
Republican71
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 69, nays 26. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (11-3-1).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
1 primary · 42 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Brian Glorioso
RRepublican
Co
Barbara Freiberg
RRepublican
Co
Beau Beaullieu
RRepublican
Co
BA
Beryl Amedée
RRepublican
Co
Beth Billings
RRepublican
Co
Chad Boyer
RRepublican
Co
Chance Henry
RRepublican
Co
Chris Turner
RRepublican
Co
Chuck Owen
RRepublican
Co
Dennis Bamburg
RRepublican
Co
Dixon McMakin
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 34
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 34. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline