CORRECTIONS/PRISONERS: Provides relative to proceedings in forma pauperis for prisoners (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)
HB 199 changes how incarcerated individuals pay court filing fees. It requires correctional facilities to forward money from a prisoner's account to the court whenever the balance exceeds $10, continuing until all fees are covered. This directly affects prisoners seeking to file lawsuits or court documents by making fee payments more manageable through regular, smaller transfers instead of requiring large upfront payments. The bill modifies existing procedures to streamline the payment process for in forma pauperis (fee-free) proceedings.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2025
House Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Apr 1, 2025
Signed Jun 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB199 Original
→
HB199 Act 253
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was enrolled and formatted for final passage, changing the header from 'Original' to 'Act No. 253'. Substantively, the law was reorganized to clarify that prisoners who are no longer incarcerated must submit an affidavit of present assets rather than a trust fund statement. The fee calculation rules were also restructured to explicitly distinguish between fees based on trust accounts versus present assets, while retaining the requirement for monthly payments of 20% of income until filing fees are paid.
Scope change
The scope of applicability was clarified by adding a specific provision for prisoners who are no longer incarcerated, requiring them to submit asset affidavits instead of trust fund statements.
REQUIREMENT
Reorganized the statute to explicitly separate fee calculation methods for prisoners with trust accounts versus those with present assets.
Added a specific requirement for released prisoners to submit an affidavit of present assets and supporting documentation.
TECHNICAL
Updated document headers and page counts to reflect the enrolled status of the Act.
Floor votes · Senate Jun 8, 2025 · House May 19, 2025
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Jun 8, 2025
D
Democratic11
90% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Jun 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 99, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.
lower
Jun 8, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments. Rules suspended. Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 96, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (9-0).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kathy Edmonston
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 199
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 199. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline