Shooting ranges.
Summary
Provides that the maintenance, repair, renovation, modernization, or expansion of buildings, structures, or facilities used in connection with a shooting range, including improvements to safety, security accessibility, or environmental controls, is a continuation of a permitted use and may not be treated by a local unit of government as: (1) an expansion of a nonconforming use; or (2) a basis to deny, delay, or condition approval of any permit that is otherwise required under applicable building codes or safety regulations. Provides that if an area is zoned for commercial use, a retail sporting goods store is a permitted use on each lot or parcel. Provides that if a property is zoned for commercial, industrial, or agricultural use, an indoor shooting range is permitted on any lot or parcel if certain conditions are satisfied.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Signed into Law
Mar 2026
Introduced Jan 5, 2026
Signed Mar 5, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Senate Bill (H)
→
Senate Bill (S)
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was updated from a Senate Bill (SB) to an Engrossed Senate Bill (ES), indicating it has passed both the House and Senate with amendments. The substantive content now includes new provisions protecting shooting ranges from local zoning restrictions and clarifying that maintenance or expansion of these facilities does not trigger nonconforming use penalties. It also expands rights for retired judicial officers to carry firearms in locations where active law enforcement officers are permitted.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to explicitly include protections for shooting range facilities (such as expansions and renovations) and added specific rights for retired judicial officers regarding firearm possession.
SCOPE
New protections were added to prevent local governments from treating the maintenance, repair, or expansion of shooting range facilities as a 'nonconforming use' that could be restricted or denied permits.
New provisions were added to clarify that local units of government cannot condition permits on annexation consent or waive rights granted by the chapter.
ELIGIBILITY
The section regarding judicial officers was modified to explicitly include 'retired' judicial officers, granting them the same firearm possession rights as active law enforcement officers in specific locations.
TIMELINE
The bill's status changed from 'SB' to 'ES' and the date was updated to February 10, 2026, reflecting that the House has amended and passed the bill with new language.
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2026 · House Feb 16, 2026
How they voted
38–6
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 48
Jan 26, 2026
D
Democratic9
66% Nay
R
Republican39
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
45
Key actions
10
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 5, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor
executive
Feb 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President of the Senate
upper
Feb 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
upper
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rules Suspended. Conference Committee Report 1: adopted by the House; Roll Call 403: yeas 67, nays 25
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by the Speaker
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules Suspended. Conference Committee Report 1: adopted by the Senate; Roll Call 309: yeas 42, nays 8
upper
Feb 17, 2026
Introduced
Senate dissented from House amendments
upper
Feb 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 252: yeas 65, nays 25
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
lower
Jan 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 75: yeas 38, nays 6
upper
Jan 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee report: do pass, adopted
upper
4 primary · 12 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ben Smaltz
RRepublican
P
Jim Buck
RRepublican
P
Jim Tomes
RRepublican
P
Mike Young
RRepublican
Co
Aaron Freeman
RRepublican
Co
Blake Doriot
RRepublican
Co
Eric Koch
RRepublican
Co
Gary Byrne
RRepublican
Co
Jim Lucas
RRepublican
Co
Jim Pressel
RRepublican
Co
Liz Brown
RRepublican
Co
Matt Commons
RRepublican
Co
Michael Crider
RRepublican
Co
Mike Bohacek
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 176
Scope: IN
Hi! I can help you understand SB 176. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline