Confined feeding operations.
Summary
Creates a preapplication process for the approval of confined feeding operations. Provides that the department of environmental management (department) must refund a confined feeding operation application fee under certain circumstances. Provides that certain confined feeding operations do not need to use certain equipment for solid manure produced by livestock. Prohibits the department from requiring an existing confined feeding operation permit holder, who is applying to expand an operation, to update a previously approved facility or structure. Establishes certain requirements for earthen berms at manure storage facilities. Requires the department to: (1) designate an employee as the point of contact for information on confined feeding operation applications; and (2) distribute the contact information of the designated employee to all operating confined feeding operations.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
Signed into Law
Feb 2026
Introduced Jan 8, 2026
Signed Feb 26, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Enrolled House Bill (H)
→
House Bill (S)
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was reformatted from a printed legislative digest into a clean, official House Bill text. Substantively, the text clarifies that applicants (rather than just 'potential applicants') can request pre-application meetings and simplifies the refund process for delayed approvals. The core policy requirements regarding timelines and fees remain consistent with the original draft.
REQUIREMENT
Changed the term 'potential applicant' to 'applicant' in Section 1.3 to clarify that anyone applying for a permit can request a pre-application meeting.
Revised Section 1.3(b) to state that if the department fails to approve or deny an application within 90 days after the applicant provides notice, the department must refund the fee and continue working on the application.
TECHNICAL
Removed the explanatory 'Printing Code' section and converted the document into standard bill format with line numbers and a clean layout.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 17, 2026 · House Jan 28, 2026
How they voted
43–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 49
Feb 17, 2026
D
Democratic9
77% Yea
R
Republican40
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
10
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Feb 26, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor
executive
Feb 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President of the Senate
upper
Feb 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
upper
Feb 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by the Speaker
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
House concurred with Senate amendments; Roll Call 299: yeas 73, nays 22
lower
Feb 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 191: yeas 44, nays 0
upper
Feb 12, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendment #1 (Niemeyer) prevailed; voice vote
upper
Feb 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 117: yeas 69, nays 26
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
lower
3 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Daryl Schmitt
RRepublican
P
Kendell Culp
RRepublican
P
Rick Niemeyer
RRepublican
Co
Beau Baird
RRepublican
Co
Mike Aylesworth
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1355
Scope: IN
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1355. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline