Employee absence for certain meetings.
Summary
Prohibits an employer from taking an adverse employment action against an employee as a result of the employee's absence from work to attend an attendance conference or a case conference committee meeting with respect to the employee's child, except under certain circumstances. Provides that an employer is not required to pay an employee for travel or attendance time with respect to a conference or meeting. Requires certain persons to provide documentation related to a conference or meeting under certain circumstances.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Apr 2025
Introduced Jan 13, 2025
Signed Apr 24, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
Enrolled Senate Bill (S)
→
Senate Bill (S)
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to clarify its scope by removing the term 'Case Conference' and replacing it with 'Certain Meetings' in several sections. This change broadens the language to encompass both case conference committee meetings and attendance conferences under IC 20-33-2.5, ensuring employees are protected from adverse employment actions for attending either type of meeting related to their child. The amendment also reorganized the text to better align with the committee's recommendations while maintaining the core protections for employees.
Scope change
The bill's scope was clarified to explicitly include both case conference committee meetings and attendance conferences under IC 20-33-2.5, rather than only case conference committee meetings.
SCOPE
Replaced 'Case Conference' with 'Certain Meetings' to clarify that both case conference committee meetings and attendance conferences are covered.
REQUIREMENT
Reorganized Section 6 to list both types of meetings (case conference committee meeting and attendance conference) as protected absences.
TECHNICAL
Updated documentation requirements in Sections 7 and 8 to reference 'the meeting described in section 6' rather than 'a conference or meeting described in section 6' for consistency.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 20, 2025 · House Apr 9, 2025
How they voted
30–19
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 50
Feb 20, 2025
D
Democratic10
90% Yea
R
Republican40
52% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Apr 24, 2025
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor
executive
Apr 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President of the Senate
upper
Apr 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Signed by the Speaker
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 415: yeas 96, nays 0
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report: do pass, adopted
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 191: yeas 30, nays 19
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
Amendment #4 (Rogers) prevailed; voice vote
upper
Feb 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Amendment #1 (Pol) prevailed; voice vote
upper
Jan 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
upper
3 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Becky Cash
RRepublican
P
Linda Rogers
RRepublican
P
Rodney Pol
DDemocratic
Co
Andrea Hunley
DDemocratic
Co
Blake Doriot
RRepublican
Co
Chuck Moseley
DDemocratic
Co
David Niezgodski
DDemocratic
Co
Greg Walker
RRepublican
Co
Julie Olthoff
RRepublican
Co
La Keisha Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Lonnie Randolph
DDemocratic
Co
Shelli Yoder
DDemocratic
Co
Stacey Donato
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 409
Scope: IN
Hi! I can help you understand SB 409. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline