REQUESTING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TO CONDUCT A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS ON THE BEST PATHS TO MAXIMIZE COST REDUCTION AND MINIMIZE FINANCIAL RISK TO HAWAII RESIDENTS WHILE MEETING STATE GOALS.
This Senate Resolution requests the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission to conduct an independent analysis of energy strategies that reduce costs and financial risks for residents while meeting state goals. The bill directs the commission to evaluate various options through 2055, including renewable energy and long-duration storage technologies, without limiting the scope to specific fuel types or pre-set assumptions. The analysis aims to compare different approaches to energy generation and storage to inform future planning and ensure decisions benefit the public interest.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 16, 2026
Last action May 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
SR163
→
SR163_SD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to expand its applicability to both Senate and House districts, update internal tracking dates and reference numbers, and restructure the legislative text to include a specific designation for the 2026 session. The core policy content regarding the request for a cost-benefit analysis of energy sources remains substantively unchanged, though minor phrasing adjustments were made to improve clarity in the 'Whereas' clauses.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded from applying only to Senate districts (SCR) to explicitly including both Senate and House districts (SCR SD or HD), broadening the potential legislative origin of the resolution.
SCOPE
Changed the bill title and sponsor section to indicate applicability to both Senate and House districts (SD or HD) instead of just Senate districts.
TECHNICAL
Updated internal tracking metadata, including revision numbers, reference codes, and specific timestamps associated with the bill's filing and processing.
Adjusted the formatting and phrasing within the 'Whereas' clauses to improve readability and flow, such as splitting long sentences and correcting date formatting, without altering the underlying policy arguments.
Replaced the generic 'Print' instruction with a specific 'S.D. 1' designation and updated the language style from English to Japanese in the document metadata.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Apr 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Report and Resolution Adopted, as amended (SD 1).
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from CPN (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 3527) with recommendation of adoption, as amended (SD 1).
upper
Apr 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on CPN recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in CPN were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Keohokalole, Fukunaga, Lamosao, McKelvey; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Awa.
upper
Apr 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on CPN has scheduled a public hearing on 04-07-26 9:15AM; Conference Room 229 & Videoconference.
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Committee
Referred to CPN.
upper
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
Offered.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Lee
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SR 163
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand SR 163. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline