RELATING TO NEPOTISM.
Summary
Subjects all nominated, appointed, or elected officers and employees of the State, including members of boards, commissions, and committees; individuals under contract to the State or constitutional convention; and legislators, delegates to a constitutional convention, and justices and judges, and their respective employees, to nepotism prohibitions in the State's Code of Ethics. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2026
Last action Mar 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB2661_HD1
→
SB2661_SD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill was revised to remove exemptions for legislators and judges from state nepotism rules, while simultaneously narrowing the definition of 'employee' to exclude elected officials. The changes clarify that the law targets only legislative and judicial employees, not the officials themselves, and shifts the effective date from a distant future to immediate approval.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed to apply only to employees of the legislative and judicial branches, explicitly removing elected legislators, delegates, judges, and justices from the nepotism prohibitions.
SCOPE
Removed language subjecting legislators, delegates, judges, and justices to nepotism prohibitions.
DEFINITION
Modified the definition of 'employee' to exclude elected officers and delegates to a constitutional convention.
REQUIREMENT
Updated the purpose statement to reflect that the Act applies only to employees rather than all officers and employees.
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date from July 1, 3000, to upon approval of the bill.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Mar 30, 2026
Committee
Reported from LMG (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1494-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to JHA.
lower
Mar 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
The committee on LMG recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 4 Ayes: Representative(s) Ichiyama, Kahaloa, Morikawa, Matsumoto; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Quinlan.
lower
Mar 12, 2026
Committee
Referred to LMG, JHA, referral sheet 17
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Introduced
Received from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 276) in amended form (SD 1).
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Third Reading, as amended (SD 1). Ayes, 25; Aye(s) with reservations: none . Noes, 0 (none). Excused, 0 (none). Transmitted to House.
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1).
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on JDC recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in JDC were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Rhoads, Gabbard, San Buenaventura, Awa; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Chang.
upper
Feb 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on JDC has scheduled a public hearing on 02-13-26 9:00AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference.
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Committee
Re-Referred to JDC.
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Referred to GVO, JDC.
upper
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
Introduced.
upper
6 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 2661
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 2661. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline