RELATING TO ORDERS FOR PROTECTION.
Summary
Reinstates mandatory minimum jail sentences for successive violations of the same order for protection. Removes the distinction between domestic and non-domestic violations of an order for protection. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 16, 2025
Last action Dec 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB383
→
HB383_HD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill revision tightens penalties for violating orders for protection by removing the ability for courts to suspend mandatory jail sentences and clarifying that violations of temporary restraining orders count as repeat offenses. It also sets a distant future effective date of July 1, 3000, likely to allow time for public notice before enforcement begins.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on orders for protection, but the applicability of sentencing rules has expanded by eliminating the court's discretion to suspend sentences and explicitly including temporary restraining orders in repeat violation calculations.
ENFORCEMENT
Removed the court's ability to suspend mandatory minimum jail sentences for violating orders for protection.
Added a provision stating that a conviction for violating a temporary restraining order counts as a second or subsequent violation of an order for protection.
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date of the Act from 'upon approval' to July 1, 3000.
TECHNICAL
Adjusted formatting of fines and jail terms to remove bracketed options, finalizing specific penalty amounts.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Feb 14, 2025
Committee
Reported from HSH (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 668) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to JHA.
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on HSH recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 9 Ayes: Representative(s) Marten, Olds, Amato, Chun, Keohokapu-Lee Loy, Takayama, Takenouchi, Alcos, Garcia; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and Excused: none.
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to HSH, JHA, referral sheet 1
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nadine Nakamura
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 383
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 383. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline