RELATING TO COURT-ORDERED PAYMENTS.
Summary
Requires the Judiciary to contract with a collection agency or licensed attorney to collect delinquent court-ordered fees, fines, sanctions, and court costs. Clarifies the collection and prioritization of court-ordered fees, fines, and restitution. Establishes procedures for proof of compliance hearings and consequences for nonpayment. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 26, 2026
Last action Feb 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB2254
→
HB2254_HD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates the handling of court-ordered payments by clarifying the order of fines and fees, simplifying the process for restitution compliance hearings, and setting a future effective date of July 1, 3000. The changes aim to streamline how courts manage delinquent payments and ensure clear procedures for defendants who fail to pay restitution or fees.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on court-ordered payments, but it modifies the specific rules for restitution and fines to improve clarity and enforcement procedures.
REQUIREMENT
Reversed the order of fines and fees in the text to clarify that fees are addressed before fines.
Adjusted the list of collectible items to prioritize fees and fines over restitution in the collection agency description.
ENFORCEMENT
Simplified the restitution compliance hearing process by removing redundant language about when a defendant must appear.
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date of the Act to July 1, 3000, indicating a future implementation.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
4
Feb 19, 2026
Committee
Reported from JHA (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 581-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to FIN.
lower
Feb 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 9 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Cochran, Hashem, Kahaloa, Sayama, Takayama, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: none; 0 Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Belatti.
lower
Feb 3, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to JHA, FIN, referral sheet 7
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Committee
Referred to JHA, referral sheet 5
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 26, 2026
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nadine Nakamura
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2254
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2254. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline