HB 1928 Hawaii House · 2026 Regular Session

RELATING TO DEPOSIT BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING.

HB 1928 would replace the current deposit system for beverage containers with a new program requiring beverage producers to fund recycling. This shifts the financial responsibility from consumers (who currently pay a deposit) to the companies making the drinks. Under the new system, a Producer Responsibility Organization would manage the recycling program instead of the existing state-run deposit program. The bill is currently under committee review and has not yet become law.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2026 Last action Feb 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

HB1928 HB1928_HD1 · 14 edits
MAJOR
The HD1 amendment fundamentally restructures Hawaii's deposit beverage container recycling bill by allowing producers to either register directly with the department and run their own compliance program or join a producer responsibility organization, rather than mandating all producers join a single PPO. It adds a new violations and enforcement section, expands third-party audit requirements to cover producers and redemption centers, introduces specific redemption rate goals and distance-based convenience standards, and changes the de minimis producer threshold from a weight-based measure (one ton) to a volume-based measure (two million containers).
SCOPE

Producers now have two registration options: register directly with the department and implement a program individually, or register with and join a producer responsibility organization. Previously all producers were required to join a PPO.

ELIGIBILITY

The de minimis producer threshold changed from 'less than one ton of deposit beverage containers' (weight-based) to 'fewer than two million deposit beverages in deposit beverage containers' (volume-based), significantly raising the bar for small-producer exemption.

DEFINITION

The definition of 'dealer' was broadened from 'for off-premises consumption in the State' to 'for consumption in the State,' removing the off-premises limitation and potentially including on-premises beverage sales.

A new definition of 'redemption rate' was added, defined as the percentage of eligible deposit beverages successfully returned by consumers out of the total number of containers eligible for refund.

The 'producer' definition was clarified so that the first-distributor provision applies only as a fallback when no importer of record exists in the State, rather than as an independent alternative basis for producer status.

ENFORCEMENT

A new section 342G-S establishes a violations framework: penalties for noncompliance, authority for the department to use audit findings as evidence of violations, authority to conduct investigations, and a requirement that producers or PPOs report known violations to the department within seven days and cooperate in enforcement.

Third-party audit requirements were substantially expanded: audits now cover producers and redemption centers (not just the PPO), must be submitted to the department within seven days, a remediation plan must be submitted within a set number of days, and the completed audit must be posted on the organization's website.

REQUIREMENT

New redemption rate goals were added to section 342G-Q with specific percentage targets and deadlines (left as blanks), replacing the previous open-ended 'performance targets' language in the program plan.

Redemption network convenience standards changed from a PPO-proposed quantitative standard for department approval to specific distance-based requirements: set numbers of redemption centers within set mile radii of every dealer in urban, suburban, and rural areas respectively.

Producer data reporting requirements were expanded to include manufacture of deposit beverages, importation and exportation of deposit beverage containers, in addition to sales data. Producers registering directly with the department now submit reports to the department rather than a PPO.

The program plan's fraud prevention requirement was expanded to include ensuring compliance with the approved plan and this part, identifying and reporting violations to the department, and conducting corrective actions primarily through producer or PPO-led measures.

FISCAL

A new section 8 provides that unexpended balances in the deposit beverage container deposit special fund will be split between producers/PPOs (for program operation) and the general fund, with specific percentages left as blanks. Previously the remaining balance would simply lapse to the general fund.

The deposit payment provision was moved from section 342G-I to section 342G-G and now allows payment to either the department or the producer responsibility organization, reflecting the new dual registration pathway.

TIMELINE

The effective date was changed from July 1, 2026 to a placeholder date (July 1, 3000), with sections 7 and 8 given a separate effective date. This suggests the bill is not yet ready for immediate implementation.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Feb 12, 2026
Committee
Reported from EEP (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 262-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to CPC.
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
The committee on EEP recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 6 Ayes: Representative(s) Lowen, Perruso, Chun, Kahaloa, Kusch, Matsumoto; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Quinlan.
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Referred to EEP, CPC, FIN, referral sheet 3
lower
Jan 26, 2026
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
19 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors