RELATING TO FAMILY.
Summary
Establishes an exemption from mediation in paternity proceedings where there are allegations of domestic abuse. Clarifies the exemption from mediation in divorce proceedings as it relates to domestic abuse. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2025
Last action Dec 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB1283_HD1
→
HB1283_HD2
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill version removes a provision that allowed alleged victims of domestic abuse to bring a supporting person, such as an attorney or advocate, to mediation sessions. It also eliminates the corresponding right for the other party to bring a supporting person if the victim exercises that option. These changes tighten the rules for mediation participation, likely to streamline the process or reduce potential conflicts, though they remove a safety and support mechanism for victims.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding mediation participation in domestic abuse cases has been narrowed by removing the option for parties to have supporting persons present.
REQUIREMENT
Removed the requirement allowing the alleged victim to have a supporting person (attorney or advocate) present at mediation.
Removed the provision allowing the other party to have a supporting person present if the victim chooses to have one.
Updated the text to remove the conditional clause regarding supporting persons, leaving only the requirements for victim authorization and mediator training.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to HHS, JDC.
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 349).
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed Third Reading as amended in HD 2 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Pierick, Ward excused (2). Transmitted to Senate.
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 10 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Belatti, Hashem, Kahaloa, Perruso, Takayama, Todd, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran.
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Committee
Reported from HSH (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 521) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to JHA.
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on HSH recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 9 Ayes: Representative(s) Marten, Olds, Amato, Chun, Keohokapu-Lee Loy, Takayama, Takenouchi, Alcos, Garcia; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and Excused: none.
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
Referred to HSH, JHA, referral sheet 4
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 22, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
16 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Amy Perruso
DDemocratic
P
Andrew Garrett
DDemocratic
P
Daniel Holt
DDemocratic
P
Darius Kila
DDemocratic
P
David Tarnas
DDemocratic
P
Dee Morikawa
DDemocratic
P
Jenna Takenouchi
DDemocratic
P
Kanani Souza
RRepublican
P
Kirstin Kahaloa
DDemocratic
P
Lisa Marten
DDemocratic
P
Luke Evslin
DDemocratic
P
Mahina Poepoe
DDemocratic
P
Mike Lee
DDemocratic
P
Rachele Lamosao
DDemocratic
P
Terez Amato
DDemocratic
P
Tyson Miyake
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1283
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1283. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline