REQUESTING THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE STATE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CONVENE A PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGER WORKING GROUP TO DETERMINE THE BEST POLICIES TO LOWER DRUG COSTS FOR PATIENT CONSUMERS AND INCREASE ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE.
SCR 69 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution requesting the State Health Planning and Development Agency to convene a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Working Group. The group will evaluate policies to lower drug costs for patients and improve healthcare access, focusing on four key areas: which state agency should oversee PBMs, required reporting, fair pharmacy audit procedures, and protections against under-reimbursed medications. The working group will include representatives from insurance, pharmacy associations, state agencies, and pharmacy benefit managers. It must submit findings and recommendations to the Legislature by early 2026, but the resolution itself does not enact new laws.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Mar 7, 2025
Last action Apr 21, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
SCR69_HD1
→
SCR69_SD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was reformatted from a Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) to a Senate Draft (SD) version with updated metadata and header information. The substantive policy content was significantly expanded to include stronger language about PBM conflicts of interest, new evaluation priorities for the working group, and modified member composition to remove specific industry representatives while adding new focus areas like PBM-owned pharmacy reimbursements and patient steering protections.
Scope change
The scope of the working group's evaluation was expanded from four priority areas to seven, adding specific focus on PBM-owned pharmacy reimbursements, arbitrary accreditation requirements, and patient steering practices. The member composition was modified to remove explicit representation from pharmacy benefit manager industry representatives and trade associations.
REQUIREMENT
Added new working group evaluation priorities including reimbursement comparisons for PBM-owned pharmacies, prohibitions on arbitrary accreditation requirements, and protections from patient steering practices
Modified working group member composition by removing explicit representation from pharmacy benefit manager industry and trade associations, while retaining independent pharmacy and unaffiliated pharmacy representatives
SCOPE
Expanded the resolution's purpose language to explicitly address PBM conflicts of interest and corporate healthcare conglomerate control over the prescription drug delivery chain
TECHNICAL
Changed document format from Senate Concurrent Resolution to Senate Draft with updated metadata, headers, and formatting structure
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Apr 21, 2025
Amended
Senate disagrees with House amendments.
upper
Apr 21, 2025
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 776).
upper
Apr 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Adopted with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Amato, Cochran, Garrett, Ichiyama, Perruso, Quinlan excused (6).
lower
Apr 17, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to HLT, referral sheet 33
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Report adopted; referred to the committee(s) on CPC as amended in HD 1 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and none excused (0).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Reported from HLT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 2073) as amended in HD 1, recommending referral to CPC.
lower
Apr 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on HLT recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Takayama, Keohokapu-Lee Loy, Amato, Chun, Marten, Olds, Alcos; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Takenouchi, Garcia.
lower
Apr 4, 2025
Committee
Referred to HLT, CPC, referral sheet 28
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Introduced
Received from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 497) in amended form (SD 1).
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Report and Resolution Adopted, as amended (SD 1). Transmitted to House.
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported from HHS (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1537) with recommendation of adoption, as amended (SD 1).
upper
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on HHS recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in HHS were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) San Buenaventura, Aquino, Hashimoto, Keohokalole; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Fevella.
upper
Mar 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on HHS has scheduled a public hearing on 03-24-25 1:00PM; Conference Room 225 & Videoconference.
upper
Mar 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to HHS.
upper
Mar 7, 2025
Introduced
Offered.
upper
10 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Angus McKelvey
DDemocratic
P
Brandon Elefante
DDemocratic
P
Henry Aquino
DDemocratic
P
Joy San Buenaventura
DDemocratic
P
Karl Rhoads
DDemocratic
P
Lorraine Inouye
DDemocratic
P
Michelle Kidani
DDemocratic
P
Mike Gabbard
DDemocratic
P
Stanley Chang
DDemocratic
P
Tim Richards
DDemocratic
Co
Glenn Wakai
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SCR 69
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand SCR 69. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline