URGING THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIANS TO WEAR REFLECTIVE GEAR BETWEEN THE HOURS OF DUSK AND DAWN.
HCR 136 is a concurrent resolution urging the City and County of Honolulu to implement regulations requiring pedestrians to wear reflective gear between dusk and dawn. It directly affects pedestrians in Honolulu during low-visibility hours, citing rising pedestrian collision statistics and safety research supporting reflective gear. The resolution urges the city to develop regulations, designate high-risk areas with signage, and launch public education campaigns - though it does not create binding law. This is a procedural resolution seeking voluntary action, not a legislative mandate.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 7, 2025
Last action Mar 31, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HCR136
→
HCR136_HD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill text was reformatted from a legacy layout to a modern template, but the substantive policy content remains largely unchanged. The primary substantive change is the shift in the resolution's language from 'requiring' pedestrians to wear reflective gear to 'encouraging' them to do so, which weakens the bill's mandate. Additionally, the resolution now includes a reference to Ohio's minor misdemeanor law as context, which was previously omitted.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains the same (urging Honolulu to address pedestrian safety), but the legal weight of the request was reduced by changing 'requiring' to 'encouraging'.
REQUIREMENT
Changed the language from 'requiring pedestrians to wear reflective gear' to 'encouraging pedestrians to wear reflective gear', reducing the mandatory nature of the request.
Modified the resolution to urge collaborative work on 'designating areas of high risk' and 'erecting signage' rather than just identifying them.
SCOPE
Added a new WHEREAS clause referencing Ohio's minor misdemeanor law for walking without reflective clothing, providing additional legal context for the proposal.
TECHNICAL
Replaced legacy formatting with a modern template structure, including metadata fields and standardized headers.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Mar 31, 2025
Committee
Referred to EIG/TCA.
upper
Mar 31, 2025
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 418).
upper
Mar 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Adopted as amended in HD 1 with none voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Souza voting no (1) and Representative(s) Cochran, Hussey, Muraoka, Ward excused (4).
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported from TRN (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1714) as amended in HD 1, recommending adoption.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on TRN recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Kila, Grandinetti, Kitagawa, Miyake, Muraoka, Pierick; Ayes with reservations: Representative(s) La Chica; 1 Noes: Representative(s) Evslin; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran.
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Committee
Referred to TRN, referral sheet 22
lower
Mar 7, 2025
Introduced
Offered
lower
5 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HCR 136
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HCR 136. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline