RELATING TO GEOGRAPHICAL RESTRICTIONS.
HB 892 limits the use of geographical restrictions as conditions of probation, directly affecting individuals under probation supervision. The bill establishes specific boundaries preventing overly broad or vague location bans (such as restricting movement to entire neighborhoods or areas without clear justification). Key provisions require probation officers to justify any geographical restriction based on the individual's offense and risk level, rather than applying blanket prohibitions. This changes probation practice by mandating more tailored, reasonable restrictions instead of arbitrary area limitations.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2025
Last action Mar 18, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB892
→
HB892_HD1
·
5 edits
MODERATE
This bill clarifies legal limits on geographical restrictions imposed on people on probation in Hawaii. It specifically addresses concerns about overly broad restrictions that prevent individuals from working, living, or accessing family and cultural sites. The legislation aims to ensure such restrictions are narrowly tailored and limited in scope.
Scope change
The bill applies to all geographical restrictions imposed as a condition of probation in Hawaii, not just specific programs.
REQUIREMENT
Establishes that geographical restrictions must be limited to areas no larger than 0.5 acres
Requires geographical restrictions to be narrowly tailored to the specific criminal conviction
Prohibits restrictions on areas of land or access to sea protected by law
TECHNICAL
Corrects geographical references from 'Cahu' to 'Oahu' in the findings section
TIMELINE
Sets the effective date of the Act as July 1, 2025
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on JDC has scheduled a public hearing on 03-18-25 9:45AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference.
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to JDC.
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 299).
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed Third Reading with none voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Alcos, Garcia, Matsumoto, Muraoka, Reyes Oda voting no (5) and Representative(s) Kapela, Pierick, Ward excused (3). Transmitted to Senate.
lower
Feb 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Hashem, Kahaloa, Perruso, Takayama; Ayes with reservations: Representative(s) Shimizu; 1 Noes: Representative(s) Garcia; and 3 Excused: Representative(s) Belatti, Cochran, Todd.
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
Referred to JHA, referral sheet 3
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Tarnas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 892
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 892. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline