Pub. Rec. and Pub. Meetings/Attorney Meetings to Discuss Private Property Rights Claims
Summary
Pub. Rec. and Pub. Meetings/Attorney Meetings to Discuss Private Property Rights Claims; Provides exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies & their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights; specifies what may be discussed during such meetings; requires that such meetings be transcribed; provides that such transcripts become public records at specified times; provides exemption from public records requirements for transcripts, recordings, minutes, & records generated during exempt meetings or portions of such meetings; provides for future legislative review & repeal of exemptions; provides statement of public necessity.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Dec 4, 2025
Signed Jun 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
H 655 c2
→
H 655 er
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill text has been updated from a committee version to the final enrolled version, indicating it has passed all legislative stages and is ready for the Governor's signature. The substantive content regarding public records and meetings remains unchanged, with no new policy, funding, or eligibility criteria added or removed.
TECHNICAL
Header metadata was updated to reflect the bill's final status as 'ENROLLED' and the document identifier was changed from the committee version to the enrolled version.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 4, 2026 · House Feb 25, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Mar 4, 2026
D
Democratic11
90% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
47
Key actions
15
Committee
19
Jun 12, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by Governor
legislature
Mar 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
CS passed; YEAS 37 NAYS 0
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Rules
upper
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
CS passed; YEAS 116, NAYS 0
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported out of Judiciary Committee
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable by Judiciary Committee
lower
Feb 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Added to Judiciary Committee agenda
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Now in Judiciary Committee
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Judiciary Committee
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported out of Government Operations Subcommittee
lower
Jan 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with CS by Government Operations Subcommittee
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
PCS added to Government Operations Subcommittee agenda
lower
Jan 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Now in Government Operations Subcommittee
lower
Jan 19, 2026
Committee
Referred to Judiciary Committee
lower
Jan 19, 2026
Committee
Referred to Government Operations Subcommittee
lower
Jan 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported out of Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
Jan 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with CS by Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
Jan 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Added to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee agenda
lower
Dec 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
Dec 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary Committee
lower
Dec 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Government Operations Subcommittee
lower
Dec 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
lower
2 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Dan Daley
DDemocratic
P
Wyman Duggan
RRepublican
Co
Dotie Joseph
DDemocratic
Co
Jose Alvarez
DDemocratic
Co
SV
Susan Valdés
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 655
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 655. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline