Court-appointed Psychologists
Summary
Court-appointed Psychologists; Requiring a party to seek disqualification of a court-appointed psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against the psychologist; providing for disqualification motions; revising provisions for award of costs and attorney fees in supplemental actions against court-appointed psychologists, etc.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Mar 4, 2025
Last action Apr 29, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
S 976 Filed
→
S 976 c1
·
5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was revised from a version requiring social investigators to submit detailed reports to a committee substitute focusing on court-appointed psychologists. The changes shift the focus from social investigators to psychologists and modify the requirements for filing complaints against them, including adding a requirement to seek disqualification before filing an administrative complaint and revising fee allocation rules.
Scope change
The bill's scope narrowed from covering both social investigators and psychologists to focusing primarily on court-appointed psychologists, removing the social investigator reporting requirements entirely.
REQUIREMENT
Removed all provisions related to court-appointed social investigators and their reporting requirements that were in the original version.
Added a requirement that individuals must move to disqualify a psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against them.
ENFORCEMENT
Changed the complaint filing process from requiring a reasonable investigation certificate to requiring a disqualification motion first.
FISCAL
Revised fee allocation rules to make the claimant responsible for costs if the psychologist is not held liable, rather than focusing on sanctions for bad faith filings.
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date from unspecified to July 1, 2025.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Apr 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0
upper
Apr 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 04/22/25, 11:00 am, 412 Knott Building
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable by Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, 04/10/25, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building
upper
Apr 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Now in Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services
upper
Apr 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
upper
Mar 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Children, Families, and Elder Affairs, 04/01/25, 4:00 pm, 301 Senate Building
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Introduced
Introduced
upper
Feb 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; Fiscal Policy
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mack Bernard
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 976
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand SB 976. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline