Social Media Use by Minors
Summary
Social Media Use by Minors; Requiring social media platforms to provide a mechanism to decrypt end-to-end encryption when law enforcement obtains a warrant or subpoena; requiring social media platforms to allow a parent or legal guardian of a minor account holder to view all messages; prohibiting minor account holders from using or accessing messages that are designed to disappear or self destruct, or are ephemeral in nature, etc.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 4, 2025
Last action Jun 16, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
S 868 c1
→
S 868 e1
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended from a committee version to an engrossed version, primarily adding an effective date provision and clarifying that law enforcement must obtain a warrant or subpoena (not just a subpoena) to decrypt end-to-end encryption. The substantive policy requirements for social media platforms regarding minors remain unchanged.
Scope change
The scope of law enforcement access was clarified by adding 'warrant or' before 'subpoena' in the encryption decryption requirement, potentially strengthening the legal standard required for platforms to decrypt messages.
TIMELINE
Added Section 2 establishing July 1, 2025 as the effective date for the act.
ENFORCEMENT
Changed the law enforcement access requirement from 'subpoena' to 'warrant or subpoena' in three instances, clarifying the legal standard needed for decryption.
TECHNICAL
Added metadata headers including bill version information (e1), timestamps, and document identifiers that were not present in the committee version.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 24, 2025
How they voted
34–3
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
Apr 24, 2025
D
Democratic10
70% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican27
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Apr 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
CS passed as amended; YEAS 34 NAYS 3
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Amendment(s) adopted (736458)
upper
Apr 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 21 NAYS 0
upper
Apr 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/16/25, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 2
upper
Mar 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 04/01/25, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Commerce and Tourism, 03/25/25, 8:30 am, 110 Senate Building
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Introduced
Introduced
upper
Feb 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Commerce and Tourism; Judiciary; Rules
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Blaise Ingoglia
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 868
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand SB 868. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline