AN ACT CONCERNING THE OFFERING PRICE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND PROVISIONS OF THE FRANCHISE ACT GOVERNING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS OR DISTRIBUTORS AND AUTOMOBILE DEALERS.
This bill requires automobile dealers to clearly display the total price of a vehicle in advertisements, including federal taxes, delivery costs, dealer preparation fees, and any add-on charges, while explicitly stating that state and local taxes are excluded. It also mandates that dealers include dealer conveyance fees and processing fees in the quoted selling price and separately identify these fees as negotiable, along with listing all optional add-on fees as non-mandatory. The legislation establishes penalties for violations, including fines up to one thousand dollars and potential license suspension or revocation, while updating definitions for key terms like "manufacturer," "distributor," and "dealer" within the state's franchise act. These changes aim to increase price transparency for consumers by ensuring all fees are clearly disclosed before a purchase agreement is finalized.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Mar 4, 2026
Last action Apr 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Raised Bill
→
TRA Joint Favorable Substitute
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to replace the original text with a joint substitute version, primarily updating the bill number and committee references. A substantive addition clarifies the priority order for resolving conflicts among business owners with multiple ownership interests in a dealership, ensuring the owner with the largest stake has first priority. Minor formatting adjustments were made to fee disclosure requirements and the list of defined terms.
Scope change
The scope of the bill remains focused on motor vehicle dealer regulations, but the specific mechanism for resolving ownership disputes has been expanded.
DEFINITION
Added a specific rule stating that in ownership disputes, priority is granted first to the owner with the greatest percentage of ownership interest, followed by others in descending order.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill header and page footers to reflect the 'Substitute Bill' status and new committee assignments.
REQUIREMENT
Adjusted line numbers and formatting for fee disclosure clauses to align with the new substitute text.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Joint Favorable Substitute
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 412
Scope: CT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 412. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline