AN ACT CONCERNING THE USE OF RANKED-CHOICE VOTING IN PARTY CAUCUSES, CONVENTIONS AND PRIMARIES, INCLUDING PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARIES, AND IN CERTAIN MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.
SB 386 requires the use of ranked-choice voting in certain elections starting in 2028, including most primaries (except presidential preference primaries until April 2028), municipal elections, and presidential preference primaries. This system allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference (e.g., 1st, 2nd, 3rd) rather than voting for just one candidate. Ballots must be designed to let voters rank all candidates, and tabulation occurs in rounds: the least-preferred candidate is eliminated each round until one candidate achieves a majority of votes. The bill applies to elections for single-office positions and mandates that the Secretary of the State approves ballot formats and instructions.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2026
Last action Apr 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Raised Bill
→
GAE Joint Favorable Substitute
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was converted from a 'Raised Bill' to a 'Substitute Bill' following committee review, retaining the core mandate to implement ranked-choice voting. The most significant substantive change is the expansion of the effective date for presidential preference primaries from April 4, 2028, to January 1, 2028, aligning them with the start date for other elections. Additionally, new procedures were added to handle vote ties by requiring candidates to be eliminated by lot.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on implementing ranked-choice voting for primaries, municipal elections, and presidential preference primaries, but the timeline for presidential primaries has been accelerated to match other elections.
TIMELINE
The effective date for presidential preference primaries was changed from April 4, 2028, to January 1, 2028, ensuring they use ranked-choice voting at the same time as other elections.
REQUIREMENT
New language was added to specify that if a tie occurs during vote tabulation, the candidate to be eliminated must be determined by lot.
TECHNICAL
The document header was updated to reflect the bill's status as a 'Substitute Bill' with a new Legislative Committee Order (LCO) number and revised page count.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Joint Favorable
upper
Mar 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Joint Favorable Substitute
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Government Administration and Elections
upper
18 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Nolan
DDemocratic
P
AB
Aundré Bumgardner
DDemocratic/Working Families
P
Chris Poulos
DDemocratic
P
Jane Garibay
DDemocratic
P
Jason Doucette
DDemocratic
P
Jenn Leeper
DDemocratic/Working Families
P
Jonathan Steinberg
DDemocratic
P
Josh Elliott
DDemocratic
P
Kara Rochelle
DDemocratic
P
Laurie Sweet
DDemocratic/Working Families
P
M.J. Shannon
DDemocratic
P
Mary Mushinsky
DDemocratic
P
Nick Gauthier
DDemocratic
P
Nick Menapace
DDemocratic/Working Families
P
Paul Honig
DDemocratic/Working Families
P
Ron Napoli
DDemocratic
P
Steven Winter
DDemocratic
P
Tom Delnicki
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 386
Scope: CT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 386. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline