AN ACT CONCERNING SPECIAL EDUCATION.
HB 5325 restricts school seclusion to emergency situations only (to prevent immediate injury), banning its use for discipline, convenience, or as a planned intervention in student plans. It requires constant monitoring, cameras, and clear visibility (via windows) in all seclusion rooms. The bill also mandates annual reports on special education spending and updates contract rules for private service providers. These changes directly affect students in special education, school staff, and private providers offering these services.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2026
Last action Apr 8, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Raised Bill
→
ED Joint Favorable Substitute
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was reclassified from a 'Raised Bill' to a 'Substitute Bill' after committee review, indicating it has been amended. The most significant substantive change is the addition of detailed definitions for physical restraints and seclusion in Section 1, clarifying exactly what actions are prohibited and what are permitted. A technical edit was made to Section 2, where a bracketed list of specific hiring examples was removed from the expenditure report requirements, simplifying the reporting language.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on special education funding and behavioral intervention standards, but the new definitions in Section 1 significantly narrow the scope of what constitutes a prohibited 'physical restraint' or 'seclusion' by explicitly excluding common calming techniques and medical devices.
DEFINITION
Added new definitions for 'Life-threatening physical restraint,' 'Psychopharmacologic agent,' 'Physical restraint,' 'School employee,' 'Seclusion,' 'Student,' and 'Exclusionary time out' to clarify legal standards.
Modified the definition of 'Physical restraint' to explicitly exclude calming holds, escorting, medical devices, protective gear, and exclusionary timeouts.
REQUIREMENT
Removed a specific bracketed list of examples (hiring teachers, paraeducators, etc.) from the required content of annual expenditure reports in Section 2.
TECHNICAL
Changed the bill title from 'Raised Bill' to 'Substitute Bill' and updated page headers to reflect the new version.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Joint Favorable Substitute
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Education
lower
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 5325
Scope: CT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 5325. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline