AN ACT CONCERNING THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES' RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE INDEPENDENT MORTALITY REVIEW BOARD AND FATALITY REVIEW BOARD.
HB 5239 establishes an Independent Mortality Review Board within Connecticut's Department of Developmental Services (DDS) to review deaths of people with intellectual disabilities under DDS care. The board will examine cases involving abuse/neglect allegations, deaths under medical examiner jurisdiction, sudden unexpected deaths, or concerns about care appropriateness. The board includes DDS staff, the Chief Medical Examiner, public health representatives, and other stakeholders, operating under existing peer review and confidentiality rules. This formalizes the review process to avoid duplication with the existing Fatality Review Board.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Feb 18, 2026
Signed May 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Raised Bill
→
PH Joint Favorable Substitute
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to clarify that the Independent Mortality Review Board specifically reviews deaths of people with intellectual disabilities under the Department of Developmental Services. The changes add precise language to ensure the board's authority is clearly limited to this specific population and align the text with the bill's stated purpose, while also updating member titles for consistency.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed and clarified to explicitly apply only to deaths of persons with intellectual disabilities for whom the Department of Developmental Services has responsibility, rather than applying more broadly to all individuals under the department's care.
ELIGIBILITY
Added specific language defining the board's jurisdiction to deaths of 'a person with intellectual disability for whom the department has direct or oversight responsibility for medical care'.
DEFINITION
Changed the term 'individual' to 'person' throughout the bill for consistency and clarity.
TECHNICAL
Adjusted phrasing in the list of review criteria (e.g., changing 'Involving' to 'Involving an' and 'that was' to 'for which') to improve grammatical flow and consistency.
Added a statement explaining that the legislative changes were made for clarity and consistency with other sections of the bill.
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2026 · House Apr 8, 2026
How they voted
36–0
Passed
Total votes 36
May 6, 2026
D
Democratic25
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
2
May 27, 2026
Signed into law
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
lower
May 6, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0)
senate
May 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
SENATE PASSED
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
HOUSE PASSED
lower
Mar 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
Joint Favorable Substitute
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Committee
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Public Health
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Delnicki
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 5239
Scope: CT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 5239. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline