Lot Splitting Approval by Subject Jurisdictions
Summary
The bill provides that, on or after December 31, 2027, subject to an administrative approval process, a subject jurisdiction shall approve the a lot split of an original lot into 2 new lots if the following conditions are met: The area of the original lot is 2,000 square feet or greater before the split; The lot split does not create a new lot that is smaller than 1,200 square feet in area;If the 2 new lots are not equal in area, the area of the smaller of the 2 new lots is equal to or greater than 40% 30% of the area of the original lot;The original lot is not subject to any previously recorded was never subject to another lot split;Residential use is allowed on the original lot; It is feasible for both of the new lots to be accessed; for utility easements to serve both new lots; and for both new lots to meet land survey plat and monument records requirements;The original lot is not an exempt lot; andThe original lot is not located within a common interest community that was created on or before December 31, 2027. A subject jurisdiction may establish procedures to review and accept information related to a proposed lot split, including lot information related to:Property ownership;Physical characteristics of the lot, including geology and soils;Proposed new lot lines and new lot areas;Adequacy of water supply, sewer service, and drainage systems to serve the new lots;Adequacy of electric power and natural gas service to serve the new lots;Dedication for schools, parks, streets, and other public areas, or payment of money in lieu of such dedication; andGuarantees of necessary public improvements. A subject jurisdiction:Shall not apply a setback standard that requires a setback from the lot line adjoining 2 new lots created through a lot split if no structure existed on the original lot immediately preceding the lot split; andMay apply a setback standard that requires a setback from the lot line adjoining 2 new lots created through a lot split if a structure existed on the original lot immediately preceding the lot split and if the setback is equal to or less than 5 feet. If an original lot or any structure built on the original lot is subject to an evidence of debt constituting a residential mortgage loan lien , then prior to approving the split of an original a lot split , a subject jurisdiction shall verify that the holder of the evidence of debt constituting a residential mortgage loan (holder) lienholder has received notice of the proposed lot split and has consented to the lot split in writing. The holder lienholder may condition consent to the lot split on the satisfaction of specified conditions. The written consent of the holder must be executed in a form that is eligible for recording in the real property records of the county in which the original lot is located and must include:The notarized signature of the holder lienholder or the agent of the holder lienholder ;The name of the record owner or ground lessee of the original lot;The legal description of the original lot; andThe identities of all parties with an interest in the original lot, as reflected in the real property records. records, including any easements and encumbrances. The written consent of the holder lienholder must be recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the original lot is located. If the holder lienholder does not provide written consent to the lot split, the subject jurisdiction shall not approve the lot split. A lot split that is approved before the written consent of the lienholder has been obtained and recorded is void.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 2, 2026
Last action Apr 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Engrossed
→
Reengrossed
·
4 edits
·
Mar 24, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reengrossed to add several new co-sponsors to the House, update the legislative status header, and include a new date stamp. Substantively, the bill removed a specific justification clause regarding the critical need for starter homes and deleted a section detailing research data on housing supply deficits. These changes streamline the bill's text by removing explanatory background material while adding political support.
Scope change
The bill's scope and applicability remain unchanged; the modifications are limited to sponsorship lists, header formatting, and the removal of a specific policy justification paragraph.
TECHNICAL
Added five new co-sponsors (Camacho, Froelich, Lindsay, McCormick, Nguyen, Phillips, Rutinel, Smith, Stewart R.) to the House sponsorship list.
Updated the header title from 'ENGROSSED' to 'REENGROSSED' and revised the amendment adoption description.
Inserted a specific date stamp (March 24, 2026) and 'HOUSE' designation in the summary section.
SCOPE
Deleted a paragraph justifying the bill based on the need to increase starter home production and citing Pew Research and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation data.
Floor votes · House Mar 24, 2026
How they voted
38–26
Passed
Total votes 64
Mar 24, 2026
D
Democratic42
90% Yea
R
Republican22
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
2
Apr 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Postpone Indefinitely
upper
Mar 27, 2026
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
lower
4 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Andy Boesenecker
DDemocratic
P
Judy Amabile
DDemocratic
P
Matt Ball
DDemocratic
P
Steven Woodrow
DDemocratic
Co
Jacque Phillips
DDemocratic
Co
Karen McCormick
DDemocratic
Co
Kenny Nguyen
DDemocratic
Co
Lesley Smith
DDemocratic
Co
Mandy Lindsay
DDemocratic
Co
Manny Rutinel
DDemocratic
Co
Meg Froelich
DDemocratic
Co
Rebekah Stewart
DDemocratic
Co
Sean Camacho
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1308
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1308. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline