HB 1195 Colorado House · 2026 Regular Session

Psychotherapy Artificial Intelligence Restrictions

Summary
The act prohibits individuals lawfully permitted to provide psychotherapy services in the state (regulated professionals) from allowing an artificial intelligence system (AI system) to interact with clients in any form of therapeutic communication without synchronous, real-time interaction between the regulated professional, the AI system, and the client, or generate therapeutic recommendations or treatment plans without review and approval by the regulated professional.     Except for educational, administrative, simulation, or training purposes or as part of a research program, a regulated professional shall not use an AI system to provide, direct, or guide psychotherapy, clinical intervention, counseling, diagnosis, treatment planning, or other activity that constitutes the practice of psychotherapy with an individual or group unless the use satisfies the conditions specified in the act. At initial client contact, a regulated professional shall inform clients of the prohibitions regarding use of AI systems in the practice of psychotherapy. Regulated professionals may be disciplined by the appropriate licensing board in the department of regulatory agencies for violations of this act.     The act allows regulated professionals to use an AI system to assist in providing administrative support or supplementary support, as these terms are defined in the act, for psychotherapy services if the regulated professional maintains responsibility for reviewing any outputs of the AI system used to provide administrative support or supplementary support. If a client's therapeutic session will be recorded or transcribed through the use of an AI system, the regulated professional must disclose in advance the use of an AI system and the purposes for its use, and obtain written, informed consent from the client.     The act does not prohibit a regulated professional from using an AI system within accredited or approved educational, instructional, or professional training programs, so long as the AI system is used solely for educational, administrative, simulation, or training purposes and is not deployed, marketed, or represented as a tool for use with clients, patients, or the public. Further, a regulated professional may be involved in the development, testing, or evaluation of an AI system solely for research purposes under the oversight of a federally registered institutional review board, so long as the AI system is not offered to consumers or used outside of the research setting.     The act does not apply to regulated professionals who use or recommend the use of technology in the state that does not diagnose or treat mental health disorders, clearly discloses that the technology is not a substitute for clinical care, and:Provides self-help, therapeutic homework, coaching, patient navigation, guided meditation, journaling, or other tools specified in the act; orIs regulated by the federal food and drug administration.     Except as provided in the act, the act also makes it an unfair or deceptive trade practice under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act' for an individual, corporation, or entity (person) to use any term, letter, or phrase in the use of an AI system in a manner that:Indicates or implies that the AI system's outputs are provided by, endorsed by, or equivalent to services provided by a regulated professional;Represents that the AI system provides psychotherapy services; orRepresents that a user's data is confidential in a manner that would lead a reasonable user to believe that the privacy of their data is protected in a manner similar to therapist-client confidentiality.      The act does not impose liability on a regulated professional for defects in or failures of an AI system that are attributable to the developer or deployer of the AI system.     Further, under conditions specified in the act, nothing in the act prohibits a person from developing, testing, or evaluating an AI system solely for research purposes or using an AI system in educational, instructional, or training programs. In addition, it is not an unfair or deceptive trade practice for a person to use a technology that does not diagnose or treat mental health disorders, clearly discloses that the technology is not a substitute for clinical care, and:Provides self-help, therapeutic homework, coaching, patient navigation, guided meditation, journaling, or other tools specified in the act; orIs regulated by the federal food and drug administration.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 11, 2026 Signed Jun 3, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

Rerevised Final Act · 5 edits · Jun 2, 2026
MODERATE
This bill adds new legal restrictions and definitions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy services. It establishes specific rules for what AI tasks are permitted (like scheduling and record-keeping) versus prohibited (like direct therapeutic communication or diagnosing). The changes also introduce strict requirements for obtaining client consent and define what constitutes valid consent in this context.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of regulated activities by explicitly defining prohibited AI uses in psychotherapy and establishing a new statutory section (12-245-224.5) to govern these interactions.
DEFINITION

Added detailed definitions for 'Administrative Support,' 'Supplementary Support,' 'Therapeutic Communication,' and 'Consent' to clarify exactly which AI tasks are allowed or forbidden.

REQUIREMENT

Added a new requirement that professionals must maintain full responsibility for reviewing all AI outputs used in administrative or supplementary support tasks.

Added specific prohibitions against using AI to directly interact with clients, generate treatment plans without review, or detect emotions/mental states.

Added strict criteria for valid client consent, explicitly excluding broad terms of service, passive interactions like hovering, or agreements obtained through deception.

ENFORCEMENT

Modified existing statutes to explicitly list failure to comply with the new AI regulations as a violation of the article.

Floor votes · Senate May 12, 2026 · House Apr 16, 2026

How they voted

630
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 64
May 12, 2026
D Democratic42
41 Yea 1
97% Yea
R Republican22
22 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
17
Key actions
8
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Jun 3, 2026
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Jun 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President of the Senate
upper
Jun 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by the Speaker of the House
lower
May 12, 2026
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
lower
May 12, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (63-0-1)
senate
May 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
May 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Health & Human Services
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Health & Human Services
lower
4 primary · 42 co-sponsors

Sponsors