HB 1134 Colorado House · 2026 Regular Session

Fairness & Transparency in Municipal Court

Summary
The act clarifies that municipal court defendants have a right to counsel and that municipal defense counsel have the same notice requirements, case information, and opportunity to meet with their clients as do state-level defense counsel. Current law prohibits paying indigent municipal defense counsel on a fixed or flat-fee payment structure if the municipality prosecutes domestic violence cases. The act applies the prohibition to all municipalities and allows a flat fee arrangement if the flat fee is the same or higher than a resulting fee based on hourly compensation.     Current law requires municipal court proceedings to be open to public observation. The act requires virtual observation for all in-custody proceedings and prompt resolution of municipal cases.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
Apr 2026
Introduced Feb 4, 2026 Signed Apr 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

Rerevised Final Act · 4 edits · Apr 13, 2026
MODERATE
This bill updates Colorado laws to ensure municipal court defendants receive the same rights as state court defendants, specifically regarding remote court access and legal representation. It mandates that remote viewing of criminal proceedings be available to the public at no cost, even for defendants in custody facing jail time, while allowing exceptions only for temporary technology failures. Additionally, it requires courts to notify and allow preparation time for public defenders before holding bond hearings for detained defendants.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of remote observation requirements to explicitly include defendants in custody charged with municipal violations that allow for incarceration, whereas previous exceptions often excluded such cases. It also clarifies that municipal courts must follow these state-level requirements unless superseded by a home rule city charter.
REQUIREMENT

Added a specific exception to the remote observation rule for temporary or intermittent internet or technology issues, preventing these technical glitches from being used as a permanent excuse to deny public access.

Mandated that courts notify public defenders of defendants in custody and provide them sufficient time to meet with clients and prepare arguments before bond hearings.

Updated the list of exceptions to the municipal court applicability rules to explicitly include the right to counsel for indigent defendants, ensuring state-level protections apply unless a home rule city opts out.

ELIGIBILITY

Clarified that the right to remote observation applies to all criminal court proceedings in open court, including those involving defendants in custody charged with municipal offenses that allow for a possible sentence of incarceration.

Floor votes

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
12
Key actions
7
Committee
2
Apr 27, 2026
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Apr 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President of the Senate
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by the Speaker of the House
lower
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Feb 4, 2026
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
15 primary · 24 co-sponsors

Sponsors