HB 25-1275 Colorado House · 2025 Regular Session

Forensic Science Integrity

Summary
The act defines "knowing misconduct" as a voluntary act or omission or series of acts or omissions consciously performed by a crime laboratory employee (employee) as a result of effort or determination in which the employee is aware that the employee's conduct is improper or deceptive and involves mishandling physical evidence or data or results, incorrectly performing forensic testing, presenting misleading or false results, concealing material information, or presenting false sworn testimony about evidence. The act defines a "significant event" as an act or omission by an employee that is a gross deviation from the standard operation procedures or accreditation requirements of the crime laboratory, or requirements in law that were applicable at the time of the act or omission of the employee, that could substantially negatively affect the integrity of the crime laboratory activities. The act requires an employee to report witnessed or discovered knowing misconduct or a significant event (collectively, "wrongful action") within 7 days of witnessing or discovering the wrongful action to the director of the crime laboratory (director) or to the employee's immediate supervisor, who shall report it to the director. A director who receives a report shall investigate the alleged wrongful action. As part of the investigation, the director must compile a list of all cases that the employee worked on. At the conclusion of the investigation, the director shall prepare a written final report. When an investigation is of alleged wrongful action in a pending case, the director shall notify each district attorney who has jurisdiction over the pending case about the investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation, if the investigation determines that the employee did not engage in wrongful action, the director shall deliver the final report to each district attorney who received notice of the investigation and to each district attorney who has jurisdiction over any case that was subject to investigation. If the investigation determines that the employee engaged in wrongful action, the director shall deliver the final report and all discoverable materials to each district attorney who has jurisdiction over any case that the employee worked on in an official capacity. If an investigation concerning wrongful action by a crime laboratory occurred after July 1, 2014, and before July 1, 2025, and the investigation resulted in criminal allegations filed against the employee or a sustained internal affairs action by the department supervising the employee, the director shall, as soon as practicable but no later than September 1, 2025, prepare a final report and provide the final report to all district attorneys with jurisdiction over any criminal case that is identified in the final report that is pending or has resulted in a conviction in that jurisdiction. Upon receipt of a notice from a director about an investigation into alleged wrongful action in a pending case, a district attorney shall notify the defendant in the case of the investigation. If the case involved a crime listed in the "Victim Rights Act", the district attorney shall also notify the victim about the alleged wrongful action, if the charges have been filed but the trial has not begun. A district attorney who receives a final report of an investigation that determines that a crime laboratory employee engaged in wrongful action in any case shall notify the defendant in that case, and each defendant whose case was reviewed as part of the investigation, of the determination of wrongful action. The act establishes a defendant's right to counsel in matters involving an employee's wrongful action and a right to investigate the wrongful action, to request discovery related to the wrongful action, and to seek post-conviction relief based on the wrongful action. The act permits a court to enter a protective order related to discovery requests. The act establishes a process for a defendant convicted in a case involving an employee's wrongful action to petition for post-conviction relief based on the wrongful action. If the defendant's petition for post-conviction relief asserts facts that, if true, demonstrate that a wrongful action was material to the case, the court shall decide the claim upon the merits after an evidentiary hearing. At the evidentiary hearing, the defendant has the burden to show that the employee committed the wrongful action and that the wrongful action is material to the case. If the defendant meets their burden, the court shall vacate the defendant's conviction and grant a new trial. The act makes all records related to an investigation criminal justice records and makes release of the records governed by the existing law governing criminal justice records; except that the custodian of a final report that concludes that a crime laboratory employee engaged in wrongful action may deny inspection of the report if there is an ongoing criminal investigation or criminal case. The act appropriates $140,433 from the general fund to the judicial department for use by the state courts. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Feb 19, 2025 Signed Jun 2, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons

What changed between versions

Rerevised (04/30/2025) Revised (04/29/2025) · 3 edits
MINOR
The bill text was updated from a 'Rerevised' version to a 'Revised' version, reflecting amendments adopted during the second reading in the Senate. The changes include formatting updates to the title page and the addition of new language emphasizing transparency, notification of misconduct, and the right to litigate cases affected by crime laboratory employee misconduct.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's applicability remains unchanged; the revisions primarily reflect procedural updates and the addition of policy language regarding crime laboratory transparency and misconduct notification.
REQUIREMENT

New language was added to emphasize that prosecutors, defendants, and victims deserve transparency and notification of misconduct by crime laboratory employees who handle evidence in criminal cases.

New language was added to ensure the criminal justice system provides an opportunity to timely and fairly litigate cases where laboratory employee misconduct could have affected the outcome.

TECHNICAL

The title page was updated from 'REREVISED' to 'REVISED' and the Senate sponsorship list was reformatted, indicating procedural amendments were adopted during the second reading.

Floor votes · Senate Apr 30, 2025 · House Apr 16, 2025

How they voted

340
Passed
Total votes 34
Apr 30, 2025
D Democratic22
22 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican12
12 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Jun 2, 2025
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Apr 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
Apr 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
upper
Apr 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Apr 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Mar 26, 2025
Committee
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
4 primary · 50 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Lisa Frizell
Lisa Frizell
RRepublican
CO
2
P
Photo of Matt Soper
Matt Soper
RRepublican
CO
54
P
Photo of Mike Weissman
Mike Weissman
DDemocratic
CO
28
P
Photo of Yara Zokaie
Yara Zokaie
DDemocratic
CO
52
Co
Photo of Alex Valdez
Alex Valdez
DDemocratic
CO
5
Co
Photo of Amy Paschal
Amy Paschal
DDemocratic
CO
18
Co
Photo of Andy Boesenecker
Andy Boesenecker
DDemocratic
CO
53
Co
Photo of Barbara Kirkmeyer
Barbara Kirkmeyer
RRepublican
CO
23
Co
Photo of Bob Marshall
Bob Marshall
DDemocratic
CO
43
Co
Photo of Brianna Titone
Brianna Titone
DDemocratic
CO
27
Co
Photo of Byron Pelton
Byron Pelton
RRepublican
CO
1
Co
Photo of Cathy Kipp
Cathy Kipp
DDemocratic
CO
14
Co
Photo of Cecelia Espenoza
Cecelia Espenoza
DDemocratic
CO
4
Co
Photo of Chad Clifford
Chad Clifford
DDemocratic
CO
37