Tenant Security Deposit Protections
Summary
The act amends and makes additions to existing law concerning security deposits that tenants submit to landlords and the conditions under which a landlord may retain all or part of a security deposit. For the purposes of security deposits, the act expands the definition of "normal wear and tear". Under current law, a landlord may not retain a security deposit to cover normal wear and tear and, if actual cause exists for retaining any portion of a security deposit, the landlord must provide the tenant: A written statement listing the exact reasons for the retention (written statement); and The difference between any sum deposited and the amount retained. The act states that a landlord may not retain a security deposit to cover any damage or defective condition that preexisted the tenancy and, if the landlord delivers the written statement within fourteen days after a written request by the tenant, the landlord must also deliver any relevant documentation in the landlord's possession or control. Upon a landlord's or tenant's request, if reasonable and practicable, the act requires a landlord and tenant to conduct a walk-through inspection, either in person or via a telecommunication-assisted interactive walk-through, of the dwelling unit to identify in writing any damage or defective conditions that are beyond normal wear and tear and that did not preexist the tenancy. The landlord must provide a walk-through inspection at a time that is mutually convenient to the parties, before the termination of the lease or the surrender of the premises, and after the tenant has had the opportunity to remove furniture. A landlord wrongfully withholds a security deposit or any portion of it if the landlord: Fails to timely provide the written statement and any required documentation; Provides a written statement that fails to list the exact reasons for retaining any portion of the security deposit; Fails to timely return the difference between any sum deposited and the amount retained; or Retains a security deposit or any portion of it in bad faith. A landlord retains a security deposit or any portion of it in bad faith if the amount retained: Unreasonably exceeds the amount of actual damages; Is retained without actual cause; Is an amount the landlord knew or should have known exceeded the actual damages; or Is retained solely or in part for an unlawful, retaliatory, or discriminatory purpose. A landlord is presumed to have retained an unreasonable amount of a security deposit if the amount retained is 125% or greater than the amount of the actual damages. In any court action brought by a tenant under the act, the landlord bears the burden of proving the amount of actual damages the landlord incurred. Under current law, upon cessation of a landlord's interest in a dwelling unit, the person in possession of a tenant's security deposit must either transfer the security deposit to the landlord's successor in interest or return the security deposit to the tenant within a reasonable time. The act states that this must be done within 60 days after cessation of the landlord's interest in the dwelling unit. If a landlord's payment refunding a tenant's security deposit or any portion of it is returned to the landlord, the landlord must hold the payment for at least one year after receiving it and must disburse the payment to the tenant within 15 calendar days upon the tenant's request. A landlord does not have actual cause to retain any amount from a security deposit for the replacement of carpet or painting unless there is substantial and irreparable damage to the carpet, or substantial damage to the paint, that exceeds normal wear and tear and did not preexist the tenancy. If a landlord has actual cause, the landlord may retain only the minimum amount necessary to replace the carpet or to repaint in the area that is damaged. A landlord may not deem carpet substantially and irreparably damaged if it has not been replaced with new carpet within the 10 years preceding the termination of the lease or surrender of the premises. The act takes effect January 1, 2026. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Feb 12, 2025
Signed Jun 3, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
Revised (05/02/2025)
→
PA2 (05/01/2025)
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill's status changed from a revised version adopted on Second Reading to a preamended unofficial version containing committee amendments not yet adopted. This indicates the bill is still in the legislative process and has not been finalized by the full chamber.
TECHNICAL
Header status changed from 'REVISED' to 'PREAMENDED' indicating the bill is in a pre-amendment state with unofficial committee changes.
Date changed from May 2, 2025 to May 1, 2025 reflecting the preamended version date.
Removed 'Amended 2nd Reading' designation and replaced with committee amendment status note.
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2025 · House Apr 28, 2025
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
May 6, 2025
D
Democratic22
100% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Jun 3, 2025
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
May 7, 2025
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
lower
May 6, 2025
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily
lower
May 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
upper
May 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Apr 29, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
upper
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
lower
4 primary · 18 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jennifer Bacon
DDemocratic
P
Jessie Danielson
DDemocratic
P
Naquetta Ricks
DDemocratic
P
Tony Exum
DDemocratic
Co
Cathy Kipp
DDemocratic
Co
Dafna Michaelson Jenet
DDemocratic
Co
FW
Faith Winter
DDemocratic
Co
Iman Jodeh
DDemocratic
Co
Jamie Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Javier Mabrey
DDemocratic
Co
Julie Gonzales
DDemocratic
Co
Junie Joseph
DDemocratic
Co
Katie Wallace
DDemocratic
Co
Kyle Brown
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 25-1249
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 25-1249. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline