Housing Developments on Faith and Educational Land
Summary
The bill requires a subject jurisdiction, on or after December 31, 2026, to allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel, subject to an administrative approval process. A subject jurisdiction shall not allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property unless the residential development complies with certain affordability requirements. The bill specifies that a subject jurisdiction shall not: Disallow construction of a residential development on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development is no more than 3 stories or 45 feet tall; Disallow construction of a residential development on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development complies with the height-related standards for the zoning district in which the residential development will be built or any zoning district parcel that is contiguous to the qualifying property on which the residential development will be built; Disallow construction of a residential development based on the number of dwelling units that the residential development will contain, except in accordance with standards listed in the bill; or Apply standards to a residential development on a qualifying property that are more restrictive than the standards the subject jurisdiction applies to similar housing constructed within the subject jurisdiction, including standards related to structure setbacks from property lines; lot coverage or open space; on-site parking requirements; numbers of bedrooms in a multifamily residential development; or on-site landscaping, screening, and buffering requirements; or minimum dwelling units per acre. A subject jurisdiction shall allow the following uses in a residential development on a qualifying property: Childcare; and The provision of recreational, social, or educational services provided by community organizations for use by the residents of the residential development and the surrounding community. A subject jurisdiction may condition additional uses in a residential development on the uses being allowed only on the ground floor of the residential development and the uses occupying no more than 15% of the ground floor area of the residential development. The bill requires a faith-based organization, school district, or state college or university to notify the county assessor that a subject jurisdiction has allowed the construction of a residential development on a qualifying property within the county. (Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.) (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 4, 2025
Last action May 5, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
PA1 (02/20/2025)
→
PA2 (03/28/2025)
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill's introductory language was significantly rewritten to emphasize Colorado's urgent need for housing to address population growth and related issues like transit and commuting, replacing previous text that focused on local zoning restrictions. The list of House co-sponsors was expanded to include nine additional legislators, and the bill was reassigned to a Senate committee focused on Local Government & Housing rather than the previous committee arrangement.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on streamlining the building process for qualifying properties, but the introductory language now more explicitly frames the need for housing as a statewide priority addressing population growth and infrastructure needs.
SCOPE
The bill's introductory findings were rewritten to remove references to local zoning regulations preventing housing development and instead emphasize the urgent statewide need for housing to address population growth, transit, and commuting issues.
ELIGIBILITY
Nine additional House co-sponsors were added to the bill, expanding the coalition of legislators supporting the measure.
TECHNICAL
The Senate committee assignment was changed to Local Government & Housing, and the bill was reorganized with separate sections for 3rd Reading Unamended and Amended 2nd Reading versions.
Floor votes · House Mar 17, 2025
How they voted
39–23
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 64
Mar 17, 2025
D
Democratic42
92% Yea
R
Republican22
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
3
Committee
2
Mar 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
upper
Mar 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Feb 4, 2025
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
lower
4 primary · 22 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Andy Boesenecker
DDemocratic
P
Javier Mabrey
DDemocratic
P
Julie Gonzales
DDemocratic
P
Tony Exum
DDemocratic
Co
Cathy Kipp
DDemocratic
Co
Cecelia Espenoza
DDemocratic
Co
Emily Sirota
DDemocratic
Co
FW
Faith Winter
DDemocratic
Co
Gretchen Rydin
DDemocratic
Co
Iman Jodeh
DDemocratic
Co
Jennifer Bacon
DDemocratic
Co
Jenny Willford
DDemocratic
Co
Karen McCormick
DDemocratic
Co
Katie Stewart
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 25-1169
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 25-1169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline