Drug Crime Cost Task Force
Summary
The act creates the evaluating the costs associated with enforcement of and incarceration for drug crimes task force (task force). The act requires the university of Colorado school of public health to conduct a actuarial study (study) to evaluate the costs associated with the enforcement of drug laws and incarceration in the state. The study must: Consider and determine state and local government costs associated with the investigation of drug crimes and the enforcement of drug laws; Consider and determine the costs incurred by the judicial department in adjudicating drug crimes and supervising defendants convicted of drug crimes; Consider and determine state and local government costs associated with confining and incarcerating individuals accused of and convicted of drug crimes and the state costs associated with parole supervision for those convicted of drug crimes; and Determine the total state and local government costs associated with enforcing drug laws, investigating and punishing drug crimes, and rehabilitating those convicted of drug crimes. The university of Colorado school of public health shall provide the study to the task force. The task force shall consider the study and make recommendations to the general assembly regarding how money saved by reducing drug crimes or sentencing for drug crimes could be spent to reduce substance use and dependence in Colorado. The task force shall create a report of its findings by June 1, 2024, and shall present the report to the judiciary committees of the house of representatives and senate. The act appropriates: $79,914 from the general fund to the department of higher education for use by the university of Colorado to complete the study; $16,138 from the general fund to the department of public health and environment for administrative expenses; and $1,324 from the general fund to legislative department for per diem and expense reimbursement. VETOED by Governor June 6, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2023
Committee Review
May 2023
House Passage
Apr 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Vetoed
Jun 2023
Introduced Mar 26, 2023
Vetoed Jun 6, 2023
Floor votes · House Apr 24, 2023
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jun 6, 2023
Vetoed
Governor Vetoed
executive
May 8, 2023
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
May 8, 2023
Introduced
House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Adhere
lower
May 7, 2023
Upper · Passed
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
upper
May 6, 2023
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
upper
May 4, 2023
Committee
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
upper
May 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee on Judiciary Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only
upper
Apr 25, 2023
Introduced
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Apr 24, 2023
Lower · Passed
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
lower
Apr 21, 2023
Lower · Passed
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
lower
Apr 11, 2023
Committee
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
lower
Mar 26, 2023
Introduced
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
lower
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
KP
Kevin Priola
DDemocratic
P
Lisa Cutter
DDemocratic
P
LG
Lorena García
DDemocratic
P
Said Sharbini
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 23-1258
Scope: CO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 23-1258. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline