DCS; periodic review hearings
SB 1149 requires Arizona courts to hold periodic review hearings for children in dependency cases at least every six months. It mandates that courts notify specific parties - including foster parents, relatives, the child (if 12+), and the Department of Child Safety - of these hearings and ensures the department provides a detailed report 15 days in advance covering the child's placement, services, progress toward case goals, and dependency status. The bill also requires courts to assess parental compliance with court orders, explore relative placements, and set a permanency hearing within 12 months of removal. This law directly affects children in foster care, their families, foster parents, and child welfare agencies by standardizing review procedures to prioritize the child's safety and timely permanency planning.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2026
Last action Mar 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
Senate Engrossed Version (02/25/2026)
·
4 edits
·
Feb 25, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reorganized and expanded to include detailed procedures for contested issues and evidentiary hearings. It added a requirement for the court to make specific written findings when advising parents of potential rights termination and clarified the types of evidence admissible during hearings.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from a simple list of hearing requirements to include a comprehensive framework for handling disputes and evidentiary hearings within the dependency process.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new subsection requiring the court to make specific written findings that it advised the parent of consequences regarding failure to attend or participate in services.
Added a new subsection outlining the specific process for requesting and conducting evidentiary hearings on contested issues.
Added a new subsection detailing the types of evidence the court may consider at an evidentiary hearing, including prior documents and agreed-upon materials.
TECHNICAL
Reformatted the entire statute text to align with the Senate's official style and corrected minor inconsistencies in the original draft.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
0
Amendments
2
Feb 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
PASSED
upper
Feb 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
DPA
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
DPA
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Finchem
RRepublican
Co
Hildy Angius
RRepublican
Co
Wendy Rogers
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1149
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1149. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline